Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Fix 0<ε<10<\varepsilon<1, an integer L≥3L\ge3, and let KK be the least common multiple of the prime powers at most LL. For a prime power q=pa>Lq=p^a>L, set

Iq={b∈[qε,2qε]∩Z:p∤b, K∤qb}.I_q=\{b\in[q^\varepsilon,2q^\varepsilon]\cap\mathbb Z: p\nmid b,\ K\nmid qb\}.

For qε≥48q^\varepsilon\ge48, ∣Iq∣≥qε/4|I_q|\ge q^\varepsilon/4. For Q=n1−ε/2Q=n^{1-\varepsilon}/2, define the raw reservoir

P=⋃q≤Qq a prime power{qb:b∈[qε,2qε]∩Z}.P=\bigcup_{\substack{q\le Q\\q\text{ a prime power}}} \{qb:b\in[q^\varepsilon,2q^\varepsilon]\cap\mathbb Z\}.

For sufficiently large nn, P⊆[n]P\subseteq[n] and ∣P∣=Oε(n1−ε2)=o(n)|P|=O_\varepsilon(n^{1-\varepsilon^2})=o(n). The pieces of this raw union need not be disjoint.

Source: published PDF, pp. 9–10. The proof uses density 1/41/4 in Theorem 2. The printed density 1/21/2 is not valid uniformly: for powers of 2 the asymptotic proportion can be (1/2)(1−1/D)<1/2(1/2)(1-1/D)<1/2 with the DD below.

Bears on. Problem 297.

Proof

Put X=qεX=q^\varepsilon and D=K/gcd⁡(K,q)D=K/\gcd(K,q). Since q=pa>Lq=p^a>L, its pp exponent exceeds that in KK, so p∤Dp\nmid D. Moreover K∤qbK\nmid qb is equivalent to D∤bD\nmid b. As 6∣K6\mid K, one has D≥3D\ge3 if p=2p=2, D≥2D\ge2 if p=3p=3, and D≥6D\ge6 if p≥5p\ge5. Counting multiples in the real interval [X,2X][X,2X] by inclusion-exclusion, with an error of at most 4, gives

∣Iq∣≥X(1−1/p)(1−1/D)−4≥X/3−4≥X/4.|I_q|\ge X(1-1/p)(1-1/D)-4\ge X/3-4\ge X/4.

This proves the first statement, including the nonintegral interval endpoints. The constants are uniform in the prime and its exponent.

Each reservoir element is at most $2q^{1+\varepsilon}\le 2Q^{1+\varepsilon}=2^{-\varepsilon}n^{1-\varepsilon^2}\le n$. There are at most 2qε2q^\varepsilon integers in the interval for bb. Bounding the prime-power sum by a sum over all positive integers yields

∣P∣≤2∑q≤Qqε≤2Q1+ε=Oε(n1−ε2).|P|\le2\sum_{q\le Q}q^\varepsilon \le2Q^{1+\varepsilon}=O_\varepsilon(n^{1-\varepsilon^2}).

No prime-number estimate or disjointness of the raw pieces is needed for this bound.