Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


In the setup of gap_symmetrization, put ρ=δ/4\rho=\delta/4 and A=∏iaiA=\prod_i a_i. Suppose a multiplier 1≤T<q1\le T<q and integer representatives di′d_i' satisfy

Tdi≡di′(modq),∣di′∣≤2(q/ai)(A/q)1/k.Td_i\equiv d_i'\pmod q,\qquad |d_i'|\le 2(q/a_i)(A/q)^{1/k}.

With κ(q)=C/log⁡log⁡q\kappa(q)=C/\log\log q for the absolute divisor-bound constant, one has, for sufficiently large qq,

A≥(ρ16k)kq1−kκ(q).(1)A\ge\left(\frac{\rho}{16k}\right)^k q^{1-k\kappa(q)}. \tag{1}

The threshold is uniform for 1≤k≤d1\le k\le d and all the sets under consideration. Source: published PDF, Claim 1, p. 8. The proof retains the integer endpoint term and counts pairs, since multiplication by a nonunit TT need not be injective.

Bears on. Problem 297.

Proof

Put t=(A/q)1/kt=(A/q)^{1/k}. For each j0∈Jj_0\in J, let i∈Ii\in I be its corresponding inverse and let jj be the centered representative of Tj0Tj_0. The coordinate description of J⊆P∗J\subseteq P_* shows

∣j∣≤min⁡(q/2,2kqt),ij≡T(modq).|j|\le\min(q/2,2kqt),\qquad ij\equiv T\pmod q.

The first bound follows by forming ∑uidi′\sum u_i d_i' and then choosing a representative of minimum absolute value. Distinct j0j_0 give distinct ii, so there are at least ∣J∣≥ρqε|J|\ge\rho q^\varepsilon different pairs (i,j)(i,j), even if the jj values repeat. Neither ijij nor its residue TT is zero. Writing ij=qh+Tij=qh+T gives

∣h∣≤4kqεt+1.|h|\le4kq^\varepsilon t+1.

There are at most 8kqεt+58kq^\varepsilon t+5 integer possibilities for hh. Also 1≤∣ij∣≤q1+ε≤q21\le|ij|\le q^{1+\varepsilon}\le q^2. For a fixed nonzero integer qh+Tqh+T, the positive integer ii is a divisor of its absolute value; it determines the signed jj. The divisor estimate therefore gives

ρqε≤(8kqεt+5)qκ(q).\rho q^\varepsilon \le (8kq^\varepsilon t+5)q^{\kappa(q)}.

For sufficiently large qq, 5qκ(q)≤ρqε/25q^{\kappa(q)}\le\rho q^\varepsilon/2. It follows that t≥ρq−κ(q)/(16k)t\ge \rho q^{-\kappa(q)}/(16k). Raising this inequality to the kkth power proves (1). All constants involved are independent of the particular set, residue target, and choice of progression, and k≤dk\le d is bounded.