Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Let
Then .
Source. Bloom, arXiv:2112.03726v2, Theorem 4, Appendix A, p. 19. Bloom attributes the construction to Pomerance, via personal communication reported in Croot's 2000 thesis. This is a distinct obstruction method, not an alternative proof of the positive-density theorem.
Rewritten proof
Fix a large absolute constant . Let consist of those whose largest prime divisor satisfies . For every sufficiently large prime , all with lie in : here , so is the largest prime factor, and . Different choices of largest prime produce disjoint sets. Hence
The finitely many small primes can be omitted. For the last estimate, partial summation of Mertens' gives $\sum_{p\le X}(\log\log p)/p =\frac12(\log\log X)^2+O(\log\log X)$.
Suppose distinct have reciprocals summing to one. Choose the largest prime dividing any denominator, and label those divisible by as . For each such term, is its largest prime divisor, so . In particular none of the is divisible by . We have
whose right side has reduced denominator coprime to . If and , then is a positive integer and . The denominator condition forces , whence . Put . Then
for an absolute , using Chebyshev's estimate and absorbing the harmonic factor. Thus , contradicting if . Therefore has no unit subsum, proving the bound.
Dependencies and method
External Mertens and Chebyshev estimates. The transferable mechanism is to isolate the largest prime among a proposed representation and bound the positive integer it must divide. The complementary upper bound in this source is Theorem 3. No claim is made here that these are the best bounds in all subsequent literature.
Bears on
- Problem 47 (the construction shows that Erdős's speculated threshold would be best possible)
- Problem 298
- Problem 299