Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

For integers n1,n2n_1,n_2 with 0<∣n1−n2∣≤N0<|n_1-n_2|\le N, and sufficiently large NN,

∑q∣gcd⁡(n1,n2)1q≪log⁡log⁡log⁡N,\sum_{q\mid\gcd(n_1,n_2)}\frac1q\ll\log\log\log N,

where qq ranges over prime powers pap^a with a≥1a\ge1.

Source. Bloom, arXiv:2112.03726v2, Lemma 3, pp. 12–13; the paper identifies this as Croot's Lemma 2.

Rewritten proof

Every common divisor divides m=∣n1−n2∣∈[1,N]m=|n_1-n_2|\in[1,N]. The contribution of powers of exponent at least two is bounded independently of NN, since

∑p∑a≥2p−a=∑p1p(p−1)≤∑j≥21j(j−1)=1.\sum_p\sum_{a\ge2}p^{-a} =\sum_p\frac1{p(p-1)} \le\sum_{j\ge2}\frac1{j(j-1)}=1.

The integer mm has at most log⁡N/log⁡2\log N/\log2 distinct prime divisors, because the product of rr distinct primes is at least 2r2^r. A sum of reciprocals of at most this many primes is maximized by the smallest primes. The Chebyshev lower bound π((log⁡N)2)≫(log⁡N)2/log⁡log⁡N\pi((\log N)^2)\gg(\log N)^2/\log\log N exceeds this number for large NN. Thus

∑p∣m1p≤∑p≤(log⁡N)21p≪log⁡log⁡log⁡N\sum_{p\mid m}\frac1p \le\sum_{p\le(\log N)^2}\frac1p \ll\log\log\log N

by Mertens' reciprocal-prime estimate. Add the bounded higher-power contribution.

Dependencies

External Mertens and Chebyshev estimates, recorded on pp. 3 and 12–13. This overlap estimate is used by Proposition 3.

Bears on