Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
For sufficiently large , let . Let consist of the integers divisible by distinct primes with . Then
Source. Bloom, arXiv:2112.03726v2, Lemma 2, pp. 7–8.
Rewritten proof
First assume that ; otherwise the claimed right side is at least , so the trivial bound proves the assertion after increasing the absolute constant. Put
In the nontrivial case . Integers with no prime divisor in number by the version of Lemma 1. Any remaining integer outside has a prime divisor but none in . Write it as . Because is outside this latter interval, avoids every prime there. Lemma 1 bounds these by
Here for large , so the sieve parameters are admissible. If , apply the lemma with lower endpoint and absorb the bounded ratio of logarithms. Open or closed upper endpoints affect only constants in the same product estimate.
Summing over (overcounting is harmless) gives
The elementary prime-counting bound and partial summation give . Both remaining terms now equal , proving the claim.
Dependencies and source detail
Lemma 1 and the external Chebyshev prime-counting estimate suffice. The paper directly chooses this inside ; the trivial-case split above makes its endpoint requirement explicit when is close to .