Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Notation as on the definitions page.

Theorem 4 (p. 367, quoted). "Let α≥ω\alpha\ge\omega be regular. Then there exists a graph G\mathcal G with α(G)=α\alpha(\mathcal G)=\alpha, β(G)=ω\beta(\mathcal G)=\omega such that, fo. [sic] every γ<α\gamma<\alpha and for every vertex-decomposition Gξ\mathcal G_\xi, ξ<γ\xi<\gamma of it, β(Gξ)=ω\beta(\mathcal G_\xi)=\omega for some ξ<γ\xi<\gamma."

No GCH is assumed. β(G)=ω\beta(\mathcal G)=\omega says that G\mathcal G contains a complete nn-graph for every finite nn and no infinite complete graph. The paper offers it as the case β=ω\beta=\omega of a possible strengthening of Theorem 3 in which some member keeps β(Gξ)=β\beta(\mathcal G_\xi)=\beta (p. 367), and says it does not know whether the result extends to limit cardinals β>ω\beta>\omega.

Problem 1 (p. 367). Assume GCH. Is there a graph G\mathcal G with α(G)=ωω+1\alpha(\mathcal G)=\omega_{\omega+1} and β(G)=ωω\beta(\mathcal G)=\omega_\omega such that every vertex-decomposition of type ωω\omega_\omega has a member with β(Gξ)=ωω\beta(\mathcal G_\xi)=\omega_\omega? The paper calls this the simplest unsolved case.

Source. P. Erdős and A. Hajnal, On decomposition of graphs, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 18 (1967), 359--377, doi:10.1007/BF02280296; the edition read is named on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: Theorem 4, Problem 1 and the proof on pp. 367--368 were read clause by clause on the page images. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Pp. 367--368. Take as vertices the pairs f=(f(0),f(1))f=(f(0),f(1)) of ordinals below α\alpha and join f,hf,h when f(0)<h(0)f(0)<h(0) and f(1)>h(1)f(1)>h(1), the Sierpiński-type graph of two orderings. An infinite complete subgraph would give an infinite decreasing sequence of ordinals, so β(G)=ω\beta(\mathcal G)=\omega. For a decomposition into γ<α\gamma<\alpha classes, Lemma 2/A (p. 363) gives a class of full lexicographic type 2α{}^2\alpha, and Lemma 3 (p. 363) finds in it, for every i<ωi<\omega, ii pairs with f0(0)<⋯<fi−1(0)<fi−1(1)<⋯<f0(1)f^0(0)<\cdots<f^{i-1}(0)<f^{i-1}(1)<\cdots<f^0(1), a complete ii-graph.

Dependencies

Lemmas 2 and 3 of the same paper (p. 363).

Bears on

None directly among the problems this corpus records.