Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Ruiliang Li, On an Erdős--Lovász problem: 3-critical 3-graphs of minimum degree 7, arXiv:2512.24850v1 (31 December 2025), Lemma 3.1 and proof, printed p. 5 (PDF p. 5). The result is Bollobás's set-pairs inequality; the paper supplies the proof rewritten here.

Dependencies. None.

Used in. Theorem 3.2.

Bears on. #834: the inequality behind the ten-edge bound under the transversal reading of "33-critical".

Statement

Let (Ai,Bi)(A_i,B_i), 1≤i≤m1\leq i\leq m, be pairs of finite sets such that Ai∩Bi=∅A_i\cap B_i=\varnothing for every ii and Ai∩Bj≠∅A_i\cap B_j\ne\varnothing whenever i≠ji\ne j. Then

∑i=1m(∣Ai∣+∣Bi∣∣Ai∣)−1≤1.(1)\sum_{i=1}^m { |A_i|+|B_i| \choose |A_i|}^{-1}\leq1. \tag{1}

The paper's Lemma 3.1 consists of (1), its display (3). The uniform case follows at once and is the form in which Theorem 3.2 uses it, with (a,b)=(3,2)(a,b)=(3,2): if ∣Ai∣=a|A_i|=a and ∣Bi∣=b|B_i|=b for all ii, then m≤(a+ba)m\leq {a+b\choose a}.

Rewritten proof

Choose a uniformly random ordering of the finite set ⋃i(Ai∪Bi)\bigcup_i(A_i\cup B_i). For each ii, let FiF_i be the event that every element of AiA_i occurs before every element of BiB_i. Among the (∣Ai∣+∣Bi∣∣Ai∣){|A_i|+|B_i|\choose |A_i|} possible sets of relative positions occupied by the elements of AiA_i in Ai∪BiA_i\cup B_i, exactly one has this property. Hence

P(Fi)=(∣Ai∣+∣Bi∣∣Ai∣)−1.(2)\mathbb P(F_i) ={|A_i|+|B_i|\choose |A_i|}^{-1}. \tag{2}

The events FiF_i are pairwise disjoint. Indeed, if FiF_i and FjF_j both held for i≠ji\ne j, choose

x∈Ai∩Bj,y∈Aj∩Bi.x\in A_i\cap B_j,\qquad y\in A_j\cap B_i.

The event FiF_i would place xx before yy, while FjF_j would place yy before xx, a contradiction. Summing (2) over the disjoint events gives

1≥∑i=1mP(Fi)=∑i=1m(∣Ai∣+∣Bi∣∣Ai∣)−1,1\geq\sum_{i=1}^m\mathbb P(F_i) =\sum_{i=1}^m {|A_i|+|B_i|\choose |A_i|}^{-1},

which proves (1). If all set sizes are aa and bb, every summand in (1) is (a+ba)−1{a+b\choose a}^{-1}, giving the stated uniform consequence.