Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Published p. 265, Theorem 1.16, and pp. 281–282 (PDF).
Statement. For there is with the following property. For each , let have density at least . Let be a compatible integer array, with those one-coordinate marginals, and with every entry greater than . Then
The constants can be uniform over all feasible numbers of cells and partitions. The same proof allows entries at least .
Proof. A one-cell partition family is necessarily its full singleton family. Remove such a coordinate from the array; it contributes no choice or change of count. For , (1) is just the density hypothesis with . The case follows from Theorem 1.15, using an input tolerance twice as small to pass from individual density bounds to its product bound.
Induct on . Set
This matrix has the correct first two marginals and all its entries are at least . Let be a tolerance sufficient for the induction with partition families and output loss . Apply Theorem 1.15 to the first two families, with output loss . By choosing the original small enough, this gives at least
pairs whose coarse intersection matrix is .
Send each such pair to the ordered partition into its atoms , ordered first by and then by . This map is a bijection onto its image: recover by taking the union across , and by taking the union across . The image is therefore a family of partitions with cell sizes , having density at least in that entire partition space.
Flatten the first two indices of into one, using . The resulting -dimensional array has the same entries as , still with the required positive bound, and is compatible with the atom partition and the remaining marginals. The induction hypothesis applies to the atom family and , provided also . It counts at least tuples. Recovering the first two partitions by unions gives exactly the tuples with original pattern , establishing (1).
After removing one-cell coordinates, each dimension has at least two cells and the number of entries is at most . Thus both and all dimensions range over a finite set. Taking the minimum of the positive tolerances supplied by the preceding inductions proves the claimed uniformity.
Source precision. On p. 282 the flattening formula uses in ; for an by array the row-major index is . Compatibility, although explained immediately before the source theorems, is included explicitly here. Positivity of the entries by itself does not imply compatibility with arbitrary marginal sizes.
Exact geometry interface. Take all families equal when the marginal sizes agree. The full-family count in (1) is positive, so the lower bound guarantees at least one tuple with the prescribed joint pattern. This is a joint-atom statement, with all entries controlled; pairwise intersections alone are not a substitute. A condition may be passed to the source's strict version by using .
This is the input used by the later simplex partition argument and strong simplex argument, bearing on #174. The 1987 paper announces its geometric Theorem 1.18 and explicitly defers that proof to a separate paper; that announcement is not counted as a proof here.
Dependencies. theorem_1_15, definitions.