Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Published p. 265, Theorem 1.16, and pp. 281–282 (PDF).

Statement. For η,γ>0\eta,\gamma>0 there is ϵ>0\epsilon>0 with the following property. For each i=1,…,ri=1,\ldots,r, let A(i)⊆Ω([n];l(i))\mathcal A^{(i)}\subseteq\Omega([n];\mathbf l^{(i)}) have density at least e−ϵne^{-\epsilon n}. Let M=(mj1…jr)M=(m_{j_1\ldots j_r}) be a compatible integer array, with those one-coordinate marginals, and with every entry greater than ηn\eta n. Then

iM(A(1),…,A(r))≥e−γnn!∏j1,…,jrmj1…jr!.(1)i_M(\mathcal A^{(1)},\ldots,\mathcal A^{(r)}) \ge e^{-\gamma n}\frac{n!}{\prod_{j_1,\ldots,j_r}m_{j_1\ldots j_r}!}. \tag{1}

The constants can be uniform over all feasible numbers of cells and partitions. The same proof allows entries at least ηn\eta n.

Proof. A one-cell partition family is necessarily its full singleton family. Remove such a coordinate from the array; it contributes no choice or change of count. For r=1r=1, (1) is just the density hypothesis with ϵ≤γ\epsilon\le\gamma. The case r=2r=2 follows from Theorem 1.15, using an input tolerance twice as small to pass from individual density bounds to its product bound.

Induct on r≥3r\ge3. Set

mab∗=∑j3,…,jrmabj3…jr.m^*_{ab}=\sum_{j_3,\ldots,j_r}m_{abj_3\ldots j_r}.

This s1×s2s_1\times s_2 matrix has the correct first two marginals and all its entries are at least ηn\eta n. Let ϵ0\epsilon_0 be a tolerance sufficient for the induction with r−1r-1 partition families and output loss γ\gamma. Apply Theorem 1.15 to the first two families, with output loss ϵ0\epsilon_0. By choosing the original ϵ\epsilon small enough, this gives at least

e−ϵ0nn!∏a,bmab∗!e^{-\epsilon_0 n}\frac{n!}{\prod_{a,b}m^*_{ab}!}

pairs whose coarse intersection matrix is M∗M^*.

Send each such pair (A,B)(A,B) to the ordered partition into its atoms (Aa∩Bb)a,b(A_a\cap B_b)_{a,b}, ordered first by aa and then by bb. This map is a bijection onto its image: recover AaA_a by taking the union across bb, and BbB_b by taking the union across aa. The image is therefore a family of partitions with cell sizes (mab∗)(m^*_{ab}), having density at least e−ϵ0ne^{-\epsilon_0 n} in that entire partition space.

Flatten the first two indices of MM into one, using t=(a−1)s2+bt=(a-1)s_2+b. The resulting (r−1)(r-1)-dimensional array M′M' has the same entries as MM, still with the required positive bound, and is compatible with the atom partition and the remaining marginals. The induction hypothesis applies to the atom family and A(3),…,A(r)\mathcal A^{(3)},\ldots,\mathcal A^{(r)}, provided also ϵ≤ϵ0\epsilon\le\epsilon_0. It counts at least e−γnN(M′)=e−γnN(M)e^{-\gamma n}N(M')=e^{-\gamma n}N(M) tuples. Recovering the first two partitions by unions gives exactly the tuples with original pattern MM, establishing (1).

After removing one-cell coordinates, each dimension has at least two cells and the number of entries is at most 1/η1/\eta. Thus both rr and all dimensions range over a finite set. Taking the minimum of the positive tolerances supplied by the preceding inductions proves the claimed uniformity. □\square

Source precision. On p. 282 the flattening formula uses s1s_1 in (a−1)s1+b(a-1)s_1+b; for an s1s_1 by s2s_2 array the row-major index is (a−1)s2+b(a-1)s_2+b. Compatibility, although explained immediately before the source theorems, is included explicitly here. Positivity of the entries by itself does not imply compatibility with arbitrary marginal sizes.

Exact geometry interface. Take all families equal when the marginal sizes agree. The full-family count in (1) is positive, so the lower bound guarantees at least one tuple with the prescribed joint pattern. This is a joint-atom statement, with all qrq^r entries controlled; pairwise intersections alone are not a substitute. A condition mj1…jr≥ηnm_{j_1\ldots j_r}\ge\eta n may be passed to the source's strict version by using η/2\eta/2.

This is the input used by the later simplex partition argument and strong simplex argument, bearing on #174. The 1987 paper announces its geometric Theorem 1.18 and explicitly defers that proof to a separate paper; that announcement is not counted as a proof here.

Dependencies. theorem_1_15, definitions.