Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Setting (p. 445). A family FF of subsets of a set MM has property B when some K⊆MK\subseteq M is such that no member of FF is contained in KK or in its complement Kˉ=M∖K\bar K=M\setminus K. m(n)m(n) is the least integer for which some family of m(n)m(n) sets, each of nn elements, fails property B.

Theorem 1 (p. 445, quoted). "m(n)<n22n+1m(n)<n^22^{n+1}."

No range of nn is printed. The paper deduces (p. 445) that lim⁡m(n)1/n=2\lim m(n)^{1/n}=2, and, with W. M. Schmidt's lower bound, records

2n(1+4n−1)−1<m(n)<n22n+1.(2)2^n(1+4n^{-1})^{-1}<m(n)<n^22^{n+1}. \qquad (2)

It adds that a reasonable guess is that m(n)m(n) is of the order n2nn2^n.

Refinement (6) (p. 446, stated without proof). Taking the ground set MM to have [n2/2][n^2/2] elements, a slightly more careful calculation is said to show that for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 and n>n0(ε)n>n_0(\varepsilon),

m(n)<(1+ε) elog⁡2  n22n−2.m(n)<(1+\varepsilon)\,e\log 2\;n^22^{n-2}.

The paper adds that (6) seems unlikely to be improved much without a new idea.

Proof pointer

P. 446, proof of Theorem 1. Work inside a ground set MM of 2n22n^2 points and track the number uku_k of unordered pairs {K,Kˉ}\{K,\bar K\} that split every one of the first kk chosen nn-sets; initially u0=22n2−1u_0=2^{2n^2-1}. For each surviving pair, since ∣K∣+∣Kˉ∣=2n2|K|+|\bar K|=2n^2, (∣K∣n)+(∣Kˉ∣n)≥2(n2n)\binom{|K|}{n}+\binom{|\bar K|}{n}\ge2\binom{n^2}{n}, so KK and Kˉ\bar K together contain at least 2(n2n)2\binom{n^2}{n} of the nn-subsets of MM. Averaging over all (2n2n)\binom{2n^2}{n} subsets gives one nn-set lying inside KK or Kˉ\bar K for more than uk/2nu_k/2^n of the pairs; adding it gives uk+1≤uk(1−2−n)u_{k+1}\le u_k(1-2^{-n}). After r=n22n+1r=n^22^{n+1} steps ur≤22n2−1(1−2−n)r<1u_r\le 2^{2n^2-1}(1-2^{-n})^r<1, so no pair survives and the rr chosen sets fail property B.

Read depth

Claims checked: the definition, Theorem 1, (2) and (6) were read clause by clause on the page images of the print, and the proof on p. 446 was followed. Refinement (6) is stated in the paper without proof and its calculation was not reconstructed. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Dependencies

None in the corpus. The lower bound in (2) is W. M. Schmidt's (Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 15 (1964), 373--374), cited, not proved, in the paper.

Source. P. Erdős, On a combinatorial problem. II, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 15 (1964), 445--447, doi:10.1007/BF01897152; the edition read is named on the source card.

Bears on

  • Problem 901: m(n)m(n) here is the problem's function, the least number of edges of an nn-uniform hypergraph that is not 2-colorable. Theorem 1 gives the upper bound m(n)<n22n+1m(n)<n^22^{n+1}, the site's m(n)≪n22nm(n)\ll n^22^n, and (6) states a constant-factor sharpening without proof; neither determines the order of m(n)m(n), which the paper leaves open.