Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Setting (p. 230, Section 2). An by Latin rectangle has rows, each an arrangement of , with distinct integers in each column (the printed definition says rows and columns, but puts in each row and adds rows one at a time; see Theorem 1). The paper writes for .
Theorem 2 (p. 234). Let be the number of by Latin rectangles and suppose . Then
So in that range, with fixed or growing with ; is a fixed positive number, as in Theorem 1. The introduction (p. 230) calls this formula an easy heuristic conjecture, previously proved for , and says the paper proves it for fixed and for .
Proof pointer
P. 234. By Theorem 1, applied to each -row rectangle, lies between . Multiplying from to puts between , and both and tend to because is at most a power of .
Read depth
Claims checked: Theorem 2 and its proof were read clause by clause on the page images of the print. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Dependencies
- Theorem 1 (p. 232), the one-row estimate.
Source. P. Erdős and I. Kaplansky, The asymptotic number of Latin rectangles, Amer. J. Math. 68 (1946), no. 2, 230--236, doi:10.2307/2371834; the edition read is named on the source card.
Bears on
- Problem 725: the problem asks for an asymptotic formula for the number of Latin rectangles without restricting ; Theorem 2 gives for and says nothing about larger . The problem's claim page for this paper records that partial answer.