Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Theorem 1a, printed p. 150 (published PDF).
Statement. In the notation of the maximum-union formula, there are partial transversals with and if and only if
In this criterion may replace . The sets in the cover need not be disjoint.
Proof. A covering partial transversal has size at most . For each , its intersection with has at most elements and uses at most distinct family indices. Therefore
This proves necessity. The same argument with the rank bound on also proves necessity of the rank-form criterion.
Conversely, (1) says that every objective in the maximum-union formula is at least . That maximum cannot exceed , so there is a disjoint packing of partial transversals of sizes at most whose union is .
Partial transversals are independent in the transversal matroid. Extend each , separately, to an independent set of size , using and finite basis extension. The union remains , though these extensions may overlap. This gives the required cover. The rank version follows by the same reasoning using the rank minimum formula.