Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

For integers s,t≥2s,t\ge2, r(s,t)r(s,t) is the least nn for which each graph on nn vertices has a clique of order ss or an independent set of size tt (p. 2). Theorem 1. As t→∞t\to\infty,

r(4,t)=Ω(t3log⁡4t).r(4,t)=\Omega\Bigl(\frac{t^3}{\log^4t}\Bigr).

The paper pairs it with the upper bound r(4,t)≤(1+o(1))t3/log⁡2tr(4,t)\le(1+o(1))t^3/\log^2t (its display (2), due to Li, Rousseau and Zang), so r(4,t)r(4,t) is determined up to a factor of order log⁡2t\log^2t, and says the theorem "solves a long-standing conjecture of Erdős" (p. 3). Before it, for a constant a>0a>0, the best bounds were a t5/2/log⁡2t≤r(4,t)a\,t^{5/2}/\log^2t\le r(4,t) (Bohman and Keevash) and the exponent 5/25/2 "has stood for more than forty years" (p. 3, citing Spencer).

Source. S. Mattheus and J. Verstraete, The asymptotics of r(4,t)r(4,t), arXiv:2306.04007v5 (20 February 2024, marked on arXiv as the updated journal version), 24 pages; Theorem 1 on p. 3, read in the text layer of the retained PDF; the proof is completed on p. 16 ("proving Theorem 1"). Published as Annals of Mathematics (2) 199 (2024), no. 2, 919--941, DOI 10.4007/annals.2024.199.2.8 (publisher's record read; received 19 June 2023, accepted 18 October 2023, published online 5 March 2024 per the journal's article page); the printed version is not held and was not compared.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the two surrounding paragraphs (pp. 2--3) were read clause by clause in the text layer. The proof (pp. 3--16) was not read.

Proof pointer

By the introduction (Section 1.1, p. 4), the construction uses Hermitian unitals in finite geometry to build an algebraically defined graph, randomly modified to a K4K_4-free graph with a controlled edge distribution; its large independent sets are counted with a special case of the container method (a theorem of Kohayakawa, Lee, Rödl and Samotij), and a random subset of vertices gives a K4K_4-free graph with small independence number. The argument occupies the rest of the paper and is not reconstructed here.

Dependencies

Finite-geometry facts about unitals in PG(2,q2)PG(2,q^2) and the container method (the paper's Sections 2--4); external premises at statement level.

Bears on

  • Problem 166: the statement is the problem's inequality R(4,k)≫k3/(log⁡k)O(1)R(4,k)\gg k^3/(\log k)^{O(1)} with the exponent 44; the site records the problem as proved on its strength.
  • Problem 986: the case s=4s=4 of the problem, with c(4)=4c(4)=4, proved and refereed before the general case.