Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Notation (printed p. 374): means that every red-blue coloring of the edges of gives a red induced copy of or a blue induced copy of , and is the least number of vertices of such a . Logarithms are to the base (p. 377).
Theorem 5 (printed p. 376, quoted). "For any tree and arbitrary graph , we have
where , , and is some absolute constant."
The paper reads (5) as saying that is polynomial in both and , and says it made little effort to optimize the exponents (p. 376). Unlike Theorem 3 there is no hypothesis and none on . For comparison it recalls Beck's result on the induced size-Ramsey number of trees (the paper's [1]): for a tree with edges and larger than an absolute constant there is a graph with fewer than edges and .
Diagonal case (worked here, not stated in the paper). Taking , so and , gives for a tree on vertices, where the expression is defined.
Source. Y. Kohayakawa, H. J. Prömel and V. Rödl, Induced Ramsey Numbers, Combinatorica 18 (1998), no. 3, 373--404, doi:10.1007/PL00009828; the statement is on printed p. 376. The edition is identified in the source digest.
Read depth. Claims checked: Theorem 5 and the remarks after it were read clause by clause on the printed page, and the construction of § 5.1, Lemma 18 and the statement of Lemma 19 (pp. 397--398) were read, with the opening of § 5.3 (p. 401) and its last paragraph (p. 402) for structure only. The proofs of Lemmas 18 and 19 (pp. 398--402) were not checked. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
Section 5 (pp. 397--402), with a sparser random host (§ 5.1, pp. 397--398): with and (here is not ), take a projective plane on points with between and four times that (display (41)); on each line choose disjoint random sets of size and place a random copy of on each, independently over all lines. Lemma 18 (p. 398): there are absolute constants and such that for of order and , with positive probability for every tree of order ; the paper says Lemma 18 implies Theorem 5. Lemma 19 (§ 5.2, p. 398) says that with probability tending to every pair of vertices of is normal, having at most common neighbours off the line through them. The proof of Lemma 18 (§ 5.3, pp. 401--402) shows that when every pair is normal, a coloring of with no blue induced copy of has an induced subgraph containing every tree on vertices as a red induced subgraph, and then applies Lemma 19. Not checked or reconstructed here.
Dependencies
Within the paper: the construction of § 5.1 and Lemmas 18 and 19 (§§ 5.1--5.3). The proofs were not read, so dependencies outside the paper are not recorded here.
Bears on
- Problem 565: only through the diagonal case worked above, which gives a polynomial bound for trees, a special case of the problem's question; it does not bear on the problem's status.