Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Notation (printed p. 374): Γ→(G,H)\Gamma\to(G,H) means that every red-blue coloring of the edges of Γ\Gamma gives a red induced copy of GG or a blue induced copy of HH, and rind(G,H)r_{\mathrm{ind}}(G,H) is the least number of vertices of such a Γ\Gamma. Logarithms are to the base ee (p. 377).

Theorem 5 (printed p. 376, quoted). "For any tree TT and arbitrary graph HH, we have

rind(T,H)≤ck2t4(log⁡(kt2)log⁡log⁡log⁡(kt2))2,(5)r_{\mathrm{ind}}(T,H)\le ck^2t^4\left(\frac{\log(kt^2)}{\log\log\log(kt^2)}\right)^2, \tag{5}

where k=∣V(T)∣k=|V(T)|, t=∣V(H)∣t=|V(H)|, and cc is some absolute constant."

The paper reads (5) as saying that rind(T,H)r_{\mathrm{ind}}(T,H) is polynomial in both kk and tt, and says it made little effort to optimize the exponents (p. 376). Unlike Theorem 3 there is no hypothesis k≤tk\le t and none on χ(H)\chi(H). For comparison it recalls Beck's result on the induced size-Ramsey number of trees (the paper's [1]): for a tree TT with nn edges and nn larger than an absolute constant there is a graph Γ\Gamma with fewer than n3(log⁡n)4n^3(\log n)^4 edges and Γ→(T,T)\Gamma\to(T,T).

Diagonal case (worked here, not stated in the paper). Taking H=TH=T, so t=kt=k and kt2=k3kt^2=k^3, gives rind(T)≤ck6(log⁡(k3)/log⁡log⁡log⁡(k3))2r_{\mathrm{ind}}(T)\le ck^6\bigl(\log(k^3)/\log\log\log(k^3)\bigr)^2 for a tree TT on kk vertices, where the expression is defined.

Source. Y. Kohayakawa, H. J. Prömel and V. Rödl, Induced Ramsey Numbers, Combinatorica 18 (1998), no. 3, 373--404, doi:10.1007/PL00009828; the statement is on printed p. 376. The edition is identified in the source digest.

Read depth. Claims checked: Theorem 5 and the remarks after it were read clause by clause on the printed page, and the construction of § 5.1, Lemma 18 and the statement of Lemma 19 (pp. 397--398) were read, with the opening of § 5.3 (p. 401) and its last paragraph (p. 402) for structure only. The proofs of Lemmas 18 and 19 (pp. 398--402) were not checked. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Section 5 (pp. 397--402), with a sparser random host R′=Rn′(P,H,k)R'=R'_n(\mathcal P,H,k) (§ 5.1, pp. 397--398): with b=200b=200 and q=bklog⁡(kt2)/log⁡log⁡log⁡(kt2)q=bk\log(kt^2)/\log\log\log(kt^2) (here qq is not χ(H)\chi(H)), take a projective plane on nn points with nn between k2t4(log⁡(kt2)/log⁡log⁡log⁡(kt2))2k^2t^4\bigl(\log(kt^2)/\log\log\log(kt^2)\bigr)^2 and four times that (display (41)); on each line choose qq disjoint random sets of size tt and place a random copy of HH on each, independently over all lines. Lemma 18 (p. 398): there are absolute constants k0k_0 and t0t_0 such that for HH of order t≥t0t\ge t_0 and k≥k0k\ge k_0, with positive probability R′→(T,H)R'\to(T,H) for every tree TT of order kk; the paper says Lemma 18 implies Theorem 5. Lemma 19 (§ 5.2, p. 398) says that with probability tending to 11 every pair of vertices of R′R' is normal, having at most 30log⁡n/log⁡log⁡log⁡n30\log n/\log\log\log n common neighbours off the line through them. The proof of Lemma 18 (§ 5.3, pp. 401--402) shows that when every pair is normal, a coloring of R′R' with no blue induced copy of HH has an induced subgraph containing every tree on kk vertices as a red induced subgraph, and then applies Lemma 19. Not checked or reconstructed here.

Dependencies

Within the paper: the construction of § 5.1 and Lemmas 18 and 19 (§§ 5.1--5.3). The proofs were not read, so dependencies outside the paper are not recorded here.

Bears on

  • Problem 565: only through the diagonal case worked above, which gives a polynomial bound for trees, a special case of the problem's question; it does not bear on the problem's status.