Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Setting (p. 183). α\alpha is an ordinal with no immediate predecessor, and G(α)G(\alpha) is a graph whose vertex set has order type α\alpha. An independent set of type α\alpha is a set of pairwise nonadjacent vertices whose order type, in the order of the vertex set, is α\alpha.

Conjecture (Erdős, Hajnal and Milner, the paper's reference [4]). Every G(α)G(\alpha) contains an infinite path or an independent set of type α\alpha.

What the paper reports (p. 183, without proof):

  • The three authors proved the conjecture for every α<ω1ω+2\alpha<\omega_1^{\omega+2}, and their method breaks down completely at α=ω1ω+2\alpha=\omega_1^{\omega+2}.
  • They proved that every G(α)G(\alpha) contains a C4C_4 or an independent set of type α\alpha, and in fact that every G(α)G(\alpha) contains a K(n;ℵ0)K(n;\aleph_0) or an independent set of type α\alpha, where K(n;ℵ0)K(n;\aleph_0) is the bipartite graph with nn white and ℵ0\aleph_0 black vertices (the paper writes K(⋅ ;⋅)K(\cdot\,;\cdot) and K(⋅ ,⋅)K(\cdot\,,\cdot) for complete bipartite graphs; nn is not quantified in the sentence).
  • That proof was never published, because Laver (the paper's reference [5], printed with no title) proved their conjecture, quoted: "Let ξ\xi be an order type without fixed points. Then G(ξ)G(\xi) either contains C4C_4 or an independent set of type ξ\xi."

Question (p. 183, quoted). "Is it true that every G(ω1ω+1)G(\omega_1^{\omega+1}) either contains a pentagon or an independent set of type ω1ω+1\omega_1^{\omega+1} ?"

Source. P. Erdős, Problems and results on finite and infinite graphs, Recent advances in graph theory (Proc. Second Czechoslovak Sympos., Prague, 1974), Academia, Prague, 1975, pp. 183--192; Section I, p. 183. The edition read is identified on the source card. Reference [4] is P. Erdős, A. Hajnal and E. Milner, Set mappings and polarized partition relations, Combinatorial theory and its applications, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1970, 327--363.

Read depth. Claims checked: Section I was read clause by clause on the printed page. The paper gives no proofs of these statements.

Proof pointer

None in this paper; the results are reported with references [4] and [5].

Dependencies

None within the paper.

Bears on

  • Problem 601: the problem asks for which limit ordinals α\alpha every graph on α\alpha has an infinite path or an independent set of order type α\alpha; the conjecture above asserts this for every ordinal with no immediate predecessor, and the paper reports the case α<ω1ω+2\alpha<\omega_1^{\omega+2} and says that the method breaks down completely at α=ω1ω+2\alpha=\omega_1^{\omega+2}.