Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Setting as on the Theorem 3.2 page: R\mathcal R is the set of coprime pairs in Z2\mathbf Z^2 with distance-1 adjacency, C∞C_\infty its unique infinite component, and densities are taken over the squares B(R)={max⁡(∣m∣,∣n∣)<R}B(R)=\{\max(|m|,|n|)<R\}.

Theorem 3.3 (p. 51, quoted). "The asymptotic density of the infinite component of R\mathcal R is not zero."

No explicit lower bound is given.

Proof pointer

p. 63, assuming Theorem 3.2. If the density θ\theta were zero there would be an f(R)→∞f(R)\to\infty with θ(R)<1/f(R)\theta(R)<1/f(R) for all large RR. Theorem 3.4, applied with f(R)\sqrt{f(R)}, surrounds almost every point of B(R)B(R) by a rectangle of perimeter f(R)\sqrt{f(R)} with edges in C∞C_\infty, which gives θ(R)≫1/f(R)\theta(R)\gg1/\sqrt{f(R)}, a contradiction. The paper also says (p. 59) that its Lemma 7.3 is included to give a self-contained proof of this theorem.

Read depth

Claims checked: the statement and the proof on p. 63 were read clause by clause in the edition named on the source card; the proof of Theorem 3.4 it rests on was not checked. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Dependencies

Source. Ilan Vardi, "Deterministic Percolation," Communications in Mathematical Physics 207 (1999), 43--66, DOI 10.1007/s002200050717, the edition read for the source card.

Bears on

  • Problem 1212: the theorem concerns the infinite component of the problem's graph taken over all of Z2\mathbf Z^2 with no restriction on the coordinates. It does not consider paths that avoid coordinate 11 or pairs of primes and does not address the problem's question.