Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Let
Then, for ,
Proof. Decompose by Lemma 3.1. The exceptional and secondary parts retain the bounds in Proposition 3.2 and Proposition 3.3. For a primary representation , the ratio would imply , and ratio would imply with , by the support characterization. Both are excluded by the definition of . Every remaining fiber therefore has reciprocal mass at most by Remark 2.2.
Repeat the proof of Proposition 3.4 on this primary subfamily. Its hulls remain disjoint; the term in each fiber integral is now multiplied by at most , while the logarithmic moment remains at most four. The same calculation bounds its size by
Adding the other two contributions and using the PNT gives (1) for sufficiently large . A larger absolute error constant covers the bounded range , exactly as in Theorem 1.1. The integer one, if present, causes no exception: for large it lies in the small exceptional class.
Source. Tao, published paper, published p.815, Section 4.3. This page uses that published version.
Bears on. Problem 49.