Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

For a set AA of natural numbers, F(x,A)F(x,A) is the number of natural numbers n≤xn\le x divisible by no element of AA, and

G(x,K)=min⁡F(x,P),G(x,K)=\min F(x,P),

the minimum over all sets PP of primes with ∑p∈P1/p≤K\sum_{p\in P}1/p\le K (displays (1.1) and (1.2), p. 385).

Theorem 1 (printed p. 386). There is a positive absolute constant cc such that

G(x,K)≥e−ecKxG(x,K)\ge e^{-e^{cK}}x

for all xx and KK.

The display (1.4) prints the bound as G(x,K)≥e−ecKG(x,K)\ge e^{-e^{cK}}, without the factor xx. The factor belongs there: the abstract states the aim as a count ≥cx\ge cx and display (1.3) as G(x,K)>cxG(x,K)>cx, and Section 3 opens by putting γ(K)=inf⁡xG(x,K)/x\gamma(K)=\inf_x G(x,K)/x and announcing the target γ(K)>e−ecK\gamma(K)>e^{-e^{cK}} (display (3.1), p. 389), which is the bound with the factor xx, uniformly in xx.

Source. P. Erdős and I. Z. Ruzsa, On the small sieve. I. Sifting by primes, J. Number Theory 12 (1980), 385–394; Theorem 1 on printed p. 386 (PDF p. 2), proof in Section 3, pp. 389–391. The edition is identified in the source digest.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, the displays (1.1)–(1.4) and (3.1) were read on the page images. The proof was not checked.

Proof pointer

Section 3 argues by induction on KK in steps of a positive amount depending on KK. The trivial bound F(x,P)≥x(1−K)F(x,P)\ge x(1-K) starts it for K≤12K\le\frac12. For larger KK the primes of PP above x1−1/kx^{1-1/k}, with k=eK+2k=e^{K+2}, are either few in reciprocal sum, when Theorem 2 applied to the remaining primes gives the bound, or numerous, when counting the unsifted integers qbqb with qq a prime in [x1/k,x][x^{1/k},x] outside PP reduces the problem to a smaller KK.

Dependencies

  • Theorem 2, for sets of primes below x1−1/kx^{1-1/k}.

Bears on

  • Problem 783: with m=2m=2, Theorem 3 gives a lower bound of order xx for pairwise coprime sets, and Theorem 1 gives it for sets of primes. It gives a lower bound of order xx with an unspecified constant; it does not identify the minimizer.