Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Setting (Section 3, p. 47). is the number of integers with that can be written as a product of two integers not exceeding .
Theorem (p. 47, proof pp. 47--48). ; more precisely, for some ,
The English summary (p. 48) records only the weaker form: "I prove that the number of integers not exceeding which can be written as the product of two integers not exceeding is ."
Remark (p. 48). The paper adds that an asymptotic formula for seems hard, as does determining the least upper bound of the for which (11) holds.
Proof pointer
The paper uses the Hardy--Ramanujan theorem in the form (p. 47): with the number of prime factors of counted with multiplicity, for every there is such that the number of with or is . The products , , are split by whether both and exceed . In the first class exceeds , well above the normal order , so that class is ; in the second class one factor has abnormally few prime factors, which by the same theorem leaves choices for it and products. (The closing line on p. 48, as read on the page image, writes for the second class, where the count of products is meant.)
Read depth. Claims checked: the setting, (11), the form of the Hardy--Ramanujan theorem used and the closing remark were read clause by clause on the page images of pp. 47--48; the proof was followed in outline.
Source. P. Erdős, Some remarks on number theory (in Hebrew), Riveon Lematematika 9 (1955), 45--48; the edition read is named on the source card.
Dependencies
The Hardy--Ramanujan theorem on the normal order of the number of prime factors (the paper's reference [4]).
Bears on
- Problem 490: if all products of two sequences of integers up to are distinct, they are distinct integers counted by , so (11) gives at once for some , weaker than the bound the problem asks for. The paper does not draw this consequence; it introduces the question of p. 48 as another, somewhat different problem.
- Problem 896: every counted by is a product of two integers not exceeding , so and (11) gives the upper bound for some , weaker than the order of magnitude the problem page records. The paper does not mention this quantity.