Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Lemma (p. 372). Let be any constant. Each of the two systems
has infinitely many solutions .
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement was read clause by clause on the page image of p. 372 of the print, and the proof on pp. 372--373 was followed. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
Pp. 372--373; the only input is , the paper's (5). For (6): by (5) there are infinitely many with , and the least whose next gap exceeds satisfies (6). For (7): if (7) failed for all , then taking such an and the first prime above , the gaps from to would be non-decreasing and all below (the paper's (8)). The paper bounds runs of equal gaps: if then (p. 373), so and , contradicting (5).
Dependencies
None in the corpus. External input: , cited by the paper from Ingham's The distribution of prime numbers.
Source. P. Erdős and P. Turán, On some new questions on the distribution of prime numbers, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 54 (1948), 371--378; the edition read is named on the source card. Used in the proof of Theorem 1.
Bears on
- Problem 6, as context only: (6) and (7) give two consecutive gaps in increasing, and in decreasing, order infinitely often; the problem asks for three consecutive increasing gaps, which the lemma does not give.