Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source context: published paper, printed p. 412
(PDF p. 2), the integrals in Theorem 1. The elementary bounds below are
supplied by this compilation to make the finite calculation in Theorem 2
fully reproducible; they are not stated as a separate lemma in the paper.
Statement
For z>0 and a>1, put
h=1−a−2>0,E=exp(−2z(a+a−1)).
Then
K1(z,a)≤zhE,K2(z,a)≤zE(ha+zh22).(1)
These bound the complete integrals from a to infinity, including every
tail value.
Full proof
For u≥0, direct subtraction gives
a+u1−(a1−a2u)=a2(a+u)u2≥0.
Consequently, with c=z/2,
(a+u)+(a+u)−1≥a+a−1+hu,e−c((a+u)+(a+u)−1)≤Ee−chu.
Substitute t=a+u in the definition of Kν. Since
∫0∞e−vudu=v−1 and
∫0∞ue−vudu=v−2 for v>0,
All multipliers of K1,K2 in the numerical specialization of
Theorem 1 are positive, including
log(17/(2π)). Therefore substituting (1) gives an upper bound on its
error constant. The exact certificate verifies
a=A′>1 and all required signs before making that substitution.