Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Setting (pp. 1--5). U\mathcal U is the set of positive odd integers not of the form p+2kp+2^k with pp prime and kk a positive integer, and AiA_i (i∈Ii\in I) are all infinite arithmetic progressions contained in U\mathcal U (Problem 1.8, p. 4). JJ is the set of ii for which the common difference of AiA_i is a power of 2 times a squarefree odd integer, and KK the set of ii for which it is squarefree (p. 5).

Theorem 1.15 (p. 6).

  • (i) ⋃i∈IAi=⋃i∈JAi\bigcup_{i\in I}A_i=\bigcup_{i\in J}A_i.
  • (ii) If there are infinitely many Mersenne primes, then ⋃i∈IAi=⋃i∈KAi\bigcup_{i\in I}A_i=\bigcup_{i\in K}A_i.

Corollary 1.16 (p. 6). Either Problem 1.11 has an affirmative answer, or ⋃i∈IAi=⋃i∈KAi\bigcup_{i\in I}A_i=\bigcup_{i\in K}A_i, or both. Problem 1.11 (p. 5) asks whether some positive odd integer aa has 2ℓ−a2^\ell-a composite for all large ℓ\ell while no integer m>1m>1 has (a−2k,m)>1(a-2^k,m)>1 for every positive integer kk; the paper notes that a=1a=1 would do if there are only finitely many Mersenne primes.

Source. Yong-Gao Chen, A conjecture of Erdős on p+2kp+2^k, arXiv:2312.04120v3 (2024). Labels and pages are those of arXiv v3: the definitions of JJ and KK on p. 5, the statements on p. 6, the proof in Section 5 on pp. 26--28. The edition read is identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statements were read clause by clause on the printed pages. The proof was read but not checked step by step. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Pages 26--28. For aa in some AiA_i, Theorem 1.9 gives m>1m>1, which may be taken squarefree and odd, with (a−2k,m)>1(a-2^k,m)>1 for all k≥1k\ge1; the argument of Theorem 1.9 puts aa in {2k0mh+a}⊆U\{2^{k_0}mh+a\}\subseteq\mathcal U, proving (i). For (ii), a Mersenne prime q=2r−1q=2^r-1 with 2r−2>max⁡{a,m}2^{r-2}>\max\{a,m\} replaces 2k02^{k_0}: reducing 2k2^k modulo qq shows {mqh+a}⊆U\{mqh+a\}\subseteq\mathcal U, and mqmq is squarefree.

Dependencies

Theorem 1.9 and its proof.

Bears on

  • Problem 16: context only. The theorem concerns the infinite progressions contained in the problem's set; the paper's answer to the problem does not use it.