Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Notation (p. 22). Throughout Chapter 2, M(r,f)=max⁡∣z∣=r∣f(z)∣M(r,f)=\max_{|z|=r}|f(z)|.

Problem 2.40 (pp. 37--38, quoted). "Let f(z)f(z) be a non-constant entire function, and assume that for some constant cc the plane measure of the set E(c)E(c) where ∣f(z)∣>c|f(z)|>c is finite. What is the minimum growth rate of f(z)f(z)? Hayman conjectures that

∫0∞r drlog⁡log⁡M(r,f)<∞\int_0^\infty\frac{r\,dr}{\log\log M(r,f)}<\infty

is true and best possible. If E(c)E(c) has finite measure, is the same true for E(c′)E(c') for c′<cc'<c?"

The book attributes the problem to P. Erdős, and Table 2 (p. 253) lists it among the problems of the 1974 symposium list.

Update 2.40 (p. 38). The update credits Camera's thesis (the book's [127]: G. Camera, Doctoral thesis, University of London, 1977) with Hayman's conjecture: the integral above is finite, and this is best possible in the sense that for an increasing ϕ(r)\phi(r) with ∫0∞r dr/ϕ(r)=∞\int_0^\infty r\,dr/\phi(r)=\infty, as printed, there is an entire ff with log⁡log⁡M(r,f)<ϕ(r)\log\log M(r,f)<\phi(r) bounded outside a set of finite area. It also credits Camera with the analogue for subharmonic uu in Rm\mathbb{R}^m, with B(r)=sup⁡∣x∣=ru(x)B(r)=\sup_{|x|=r}u(x) and ∫0∞(r/log⁡B(r))m−1 dr<∞\int_0^\infty(r/\log B(r))^{m-1}\,dr<\infty, best possible in the same sense. It records independent proofs by Hansen (the book's [375]: L. J. Hansen, On the growth of entire functions bounded on large sets, Canad. J. Math. 29 (1977), 1287--1291) and Gol'dberg (the book's [317]: A. A. Gol'dberg, Sets on which the modulus of an entire function has a lower bound, Sibirsk. Mat. Zh. 20 (1979), 512--518), and says Gol'dberg answered the second part with a function for which "A(c)A(c) is finite for some cc, but not for all cc"; A(c)A(c) is not defined there and stands for the measure of E(c)E(c).

The printed sharpness condition ∫0∞r dr/ϕ(r)=∞\int_0^\infty r\,dr/\phi(r)=\infty contradicts the bound it qualifies, as the corpus's Camera claim page explains; that page states the sharpness with ∫∞r dr/ϕ(r)<∞\int^\infty r\,dr/\phi(r)<\infty, in the form of Gol'dberg's paper.

Source. W. K. Hayman and E. F. Lingham, Research Problems in Function Theory, arXiv:1809.07200v2 (21 September 2018), Chapter 2, pp. 37--38. The edition read is identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the problem, its update and the three cited reference entries were read clause by clause on the printed pages. The book proves nothing; it poses and reports.

Proof pointer

None; a problem. Gol'dberg's paper is on the Gol'dberg card.

Dependencies

None.

Bears on

  • Problem 1118: the same two questions. The book asks whether E(c′)E(c') has finite measure for c′<cc'<c; the site asks whether there must exist some c′<cc'<c for which it does. Update 2.40 credits the growth bound and its sharpness to Camera, independent proofs to Hansen and Gol'dberg, and Gol'dberg with an example finite for some cc but not for all cc.