Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Lemma 4.1, stated on p. 7 and proved on pp. 7-8, of A Bernstein-density proof of Erdős's robust interpolation obstruction, draft manuscript dated 29 April 2026, no author byline, https://www.ulam.ai/research/erdos1133.pdf, as recorded on the source card. An unrefereed manuscript.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, its setting and the proof (pp. 7-8) were read on the print. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Setting
Section 4, p. 7. Fix , take and from Proposition 3.1, and choose
which gives (7). Put . For nodes let , indexed so that . The full blocks are for , , the fewer than leftover indices being ignored; has angular span and is good when
Statement
Lemma 4.1 (p. 7). For all sufficiently large , the number of good full blocks satisfies .
Proof pointer
Pp. 7-8. The block spans sum to at most , so fewer than blocks are bad; with this leaves , and (7) makes the coefficient of exceed .
Dependencies
Only the choice (6) and the definitions above; the constants and come from Proposition 3.1.
Bears on
- #1133: the counting step in the proof of Theorem 1.1, which needs more than good blocks so that a polynomial missing a label in each misses more than labels.