Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Setting (pp. 1--2): the Collatz operator , for even and for odd (Definition 1; the map of Problem 1135); an -cycle is a nontrivial cycle of with local minima (Definition 5, p. 2: a cycle with and exactly local minima), so that its members fall into blocks, each a run of odd members followed by a run of even members; denotes the number of odd members of a cycle.
Theorem 23 (Main Theorem) (p. 15): "There is no -cycle with ."
The proof's first lines (p. 15): for , Theorem 3 of Simons and de Weger gives ; with (Definition 4, the verification bound taken from Barina's project) one gets , Theorem 21 gives , and continued fractions (Lemma 22) give ; iterating this process six more times () yields , and the proof closes on p. 16: "But this last lower bound on is larger than the upper bound of given by Simons and de Weger [12]. Thus, no such -cycle can exist."
Source. C. Hercher, There are no Collatz m-cycles with , arXiv:2201.00406v3 (4 April 2023), the version retained; J. Integer Seq. 26 (2023), Article 23.3.5 (not compared). Theorem 23 and its proof on pp. 15--16 (PDF pp. 15--16), Definition 1 on p. 1, Definitions 4 and 5 and Remark 3 on p. 2, read on the rendered page images. The artifact is identified in the source digest.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the proof's iteration were read clause by clause on the page image; the lemmas it invokes (Theorem 21, Lemma 22, the Simons--de Weger bounds) were read as statements in the text layer and not checked; the computations were not rerun.
Proof pointer
Sections 2--3 (pp. 3--16): with the number of even members, Theorem 16 bounds from above, and from below by , through the sums of reciprocals of the run of odd members starting with each local minimum ; Theorem 21 sharpens the upper bound in terms of an integer whose admissible size depends on and the verification bound ; Lemma 22 (a continued-fraction lemma: every fraction in an open interval has denominator at least that of a specified convergent) turns the bound into a lower bound for ; alternating the two steps raises the lower bound until it exceeds the Simons--de Weger upper bound . Not reconstructed here.
Dependencies
Simons and de Weger, Theoretical and computational bounds for -cycles of the problem, version 1.44 (2010), Theorem 3 (the lower bound ) and the upper bound (the paper's [12], a 2010 preprint; its [11] is the published Acta Arith. 117 (2005), 51--70, for which the paper records , p. 2; card simons_de_weger_2010_mcycles_bounds, no file held, not consumed here); the verification bound from Barina's project (the paper's [2]; the held 2020 paper reports and the project's later bound is the one used); continued fractions (Lemma 22, a well-known lemma proved in the paper).
Bears on
- Problem 1135: for the page's map , no nontrivial cycle with at most local minima exists; the current cycle-exclusion record recorded on the page, which leaves cycles with more local minima and divergent trajectories open.