Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Section I.11 (printed p. 138, in Hungarian): let be a sequence such that the products , or , are all distinct. "I conjectured, in I, that
I have since proved (1)." (The Hungarian: "Sejtettem, I-ben, hogy ... (1)-et azóta bebizonyítottam.") Paper I is the 1962 first installment of the series.
Source. P. Erdős, Számelméleti megjegyzések, V. Extremális problémák a számelméletben, II, Mat. Lapok 17 (1966), 135--155; Section I.11 on printed pp. 138--141 (PDF pp. 4--7 of the Rényi archive's 21-page scan), read on the page images; the site's key for Problem 795 cites the paper without a page.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement (1) and its two sentences were read clause by clause on the page image of p. 138. The proof sketch (displays (2)--(12), pp. 138--140) was read for its structure and not checked step by step.
Proof pointer
Pages 138--140. Split the into two classes: first those all of whose prime factors are below ; claim (2) for their number . Their subset products (3) are distinct and each is of the form with built from the primes and from the primes in ; the exponent of a prime in takes at most values (4), so has at most choices (5), and with (6) the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality bounds the choices of by (7), the number of primes in the range; the product (8) is below if (2) fails, a contradiction. The second class consists of numbers with a prime ; with the number of members sharing the prime , their number is at most (9), and (1) follows from (10) , proved by the same counting of the products (11) of the .
Dependencies
The prime number theorem for ; the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality. Nothing else is cited in the section.
Bears on
- Problem 795: the bound the site's commentary attributes to [Er66], , with its proof sketch. The problem's own question is display (13) on p. 140, , which Erdős calls not impossible while saying he cannot decide it; after a construction made with Pósa (14), he gives the lower bound (15) from sets with distinct subset sums and adds that equality perhaps holds in (15).