Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Setting (p. 1). is the permutation of the 2-adic integers defined on the conjecture's page.
Corollary 1 (p. 3): "."
The paper notes (p. 3) that the "Periodicity Conjecture" of Lagarias's 1985 survey asserts the equality , and that the corollary is one half of it. The reverse inclusion is not proved.
Proof pointer
The argument precedes the statement (p. 3). For rational the binary expansion (1) is finite or eventually periodic, so the exponent sequence is finite, of length , or satisfies for all and some fixed and . In the first case is an integer; in the second, summing the geometric tail of (2) gives an explicit linear relation with integer coefficients showing is an integer. Either way is rational.
Read depth
Claims checked: the statement and the argument before it were read on the page images of the print. A second reader checked the statement, hypotheses, label and page against the print; the proof was not independently reviewed.
Dependencies
The definition of (p. 1).
Source. Daniel J. Bernstein, A non-iterative 2-adic statement of the conjecture, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 121 (1994), 405--408. Pages are those of the author's typescript named on the source card, numbered 1--4 rather than by the journal's pagination.
Bears on
- Problem 1135: background only. The corollary concerns the 2-adic conjugacy of the Collatz map and half of a conjecture from Lagarias's survey; it does not bear on whether orbits of positive integers reach .