Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Théorème 4, printed p. 118 (physical PDF p. 15), section 2.2 "Indépendance algébrique de trois nombres", read on the page image; it is introduced as "Voici le résultat principal de [2] et [3]", where [2] is Nesterenko, Mat. Sb. 187 (1996), 65--96, and [3] his C. R. note of 1996. The exposé's proof is section 2.5 (pp. 126--128), via Proposition 3 (p. 127) and Philippon's criterion, Proposition 4 (pp. 127--128); the zero estimate behind it is Théorème 5 (section 3.1, p. 128). The proof was not checked here.
Statement
"Soit un élément de satisfaisant . Alors le degré de transcendance sur du corps
est supérieur ou égal à 3." Here is either or a field with prime (p. 106), so the statement covers complex and -adic . That is, at least three of are algebraically independent over ; for this is Nesterenko's Theorem 1. The exposé recalls Mahler's theorem that are algebraically independent over and gives the Ramanujan system as , , with (pp. 118--119), so that preserves .
Consequences listed by the exposé (pp. 119--122)
Bertrand's conjecture ( algebraically independent for algebraic with ; more generally, for with , and , at least three of algebraically independent); Corollaire 1 ( algebraically independent for complex with and algebraic); Corollaire 2 (elliptic periods and quasi-periods); Corollaire 3 (in particular and algebraically independent); Corollaire 4 (Jacobi theta series; transcendental for algebraic with ); Corollaire 5 (Lucas sequences). The card lists them with page numbers.
Relation to Problem 250
For algebraic the theorem gives that are algebraically independent (Nesterenko's Corollary 2); at , is transcendental and so is the problem's number. The exposé does not state this specialization.
Coverage
Statement read on the page image. The role of this page is exposition: a Bourbaki seminar report of November 1996 restating the theorem. No proof is checked here.
Bears on. #250, as a restatement of the theorem behind the transcendence of .