Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Theorem 1.7 (p. 637). "The maximal number f(p)f(p) of a set AA of residues (mod pp) so that sums of different numbers of distinct elements of AA are distinct satisfies

(4p)1/3+o(p1/3)<f(p)<(288p)1/3+o(p1/3)."(4p)^{1/3}+o(p^{1/3})<f(p)<(288p)^{1/3}+o(p^{1/3})\text{."}

The display is the paper's (1.8). Here pp is a prime: the section concerns the cyclic group of prime order (p. 635). The property asks that a sum of ss distinct elements of AA and a sum of tt distinct elements agree mod pp only when s=ts=t.

The constant is left open: the introduction says the correct order is cp1/3cp^{1/3} but the authors cannot determine cc (p. 635). Conjecture 1.1 (p. 636) predicts f(p)=(4p)1/3+o(p1/3)f(p)=(4p)^{1/3}+o(p^{1/3}), and Corollary 1.3 (p. 636) shows that Conjecture 1.2, that a set in arithmetic progression has the fewest distinct tt-element sums, would give f(p)<(6p)1/3+o(p1/3)f(p)<(6p)^{1/3}+o(p^{1/3}).

Source. P. Erdős, E. G. Straus, Some number theoretic results, Pacific J. Math. 36 (1971), no. 3, 635--646; Theorem 1.7 on p. 637, its proof on p. 638, the lower-bound construction on p. 636. The copy read is identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement was read on the page image of p. 637, and the constants of the lower-bound construction (p. 636) and of the final computation (p. 638) on the page images. The proof of Lemma 1.5 was read for structure; Lemma 1.4 is quoted from the Erdős--Heilbronn paper and not checked. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Lower bound (p. 636): an interval of about (4p)1/3(4p)^{1/3} consecutive integers ending near (p/2)2/3(p/2)^{2/3} has all its subset sums below pp, and sums of different numbers of its elements are different integers, hence different residues. Upper bound (pp. 637--638): Lemma 1.5 (pp. 636--637), proved by induction from the Erdős--Heilbronn Lemma 1.4 (p. 636), gives at least k/2+k(t−1)/12−t2/6+O(t)k/2+k(t-1)/12-t^2/6+O(t) distinct sums of tt elements of a kk-element set for tt up to about k/4k/4; by symmetry the same holds for k−tk-t elements. These families are pairwise disjoint, so summing the counts gives p≥k3/288+O(k2)p\ge k^3/288+O(k^2). The proof of Lemma 1.5 cites "Lemma 1.3" (p. 637) where the lemma it applies is Lemma 1.4; that reading is this page's.

Dependencies

Lemma 1.4 (p. 636), taken from P. Erdős and H. Heilbronn, On the addition of residue classes mod p, Acta Arith. 9 (1964), 149--159 (the paper's reference [2]); Lemma 1.5 of the same paper (pp. 636--637). The integer analogue is E. G. Straus, On a problem in combinatorial number theory, J. Math. Sci. (Delhi) 1 (1966), 77--80 (reference [4]).

Bears on

No numbered Erdős problem is linked from this page.