Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. The large-prime step in the Notes of proof claim 133. The cross-difference and reduced-fraction uniqueness arguments are supplied explicitly here.
For , let
Statement. Let be prime, and suppose that the residues lie in a subgroup . Then
is well defined and injective. Consequently , where .
Complete proof. Since , its residue is nonzero and has an inverse. Both and belong to , so subgroup closure gives .
Suppose in for two members and of . Then . Each product lies between and , so
The divisibility therefore forces over the integers. Because , the equality implies ; reversing the two pairs gives . Positivity yields , and then . Thus is injective.
Dependencies. Elementary modular arithmetic and uniqueness of a reduced positive fraction.
Bears on. The large-prime case in the partial threshold theorem.