Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Notation as on the Theorem 1.4 page: is the set of nonempty finite subset sums of and the set of positive integers at most .
Theorem 1.5 (p. 2). There is a constant such that for every sufficiently large the following holds. If is a positive integer with and has cardinality , then for some integer .
The paper calls this a seemingly more general form of Theorem 1.4 and notes (p. 3) that Theorem 1.4 is the case , while Theorem 1.4 gives many cases of Theorem 1.5: for square-free and , a square among the subset sums of is the same as a number in . The paper omits unnecessary floors and ceilings (p. 3), so the cardinality is read up to rounding.
Proof pointer
The general is needed for an iteration (pp. 4--5). The main lemma, Lemma 2.4 (p. 5), finds a subset of at most elements, with , such that contains a long arithmetic progression, or a large proper generalized arithmetic progression of rank 2, whose base point is modulo its common step, or else every element of is divisible by one integer . In the third case the argument iterates with in place of (p. 5), and the paper bounds the number of iterations by . Lemma 2.4 is proved in Section 8 (pp. 21--26) from Lemma 3.6, a subset-sum structure lemma built on ideas of Szemerédi and Vu, and the number-theoretic Lemma 4.3, which Section 7 proves with Lemma 4.2. Section 9 (pp. 26--27) finds in the progression in the rank one case directly; Section 10 (pp. 27--32) handles the rank two case through Proposition 10.1, proved by Poisson summation with Lemma 4.2.
Read depth
Claims checked: the statement and the reduction remarks on p. 3 were read clause by clause on the arXiv print, and the outline above was read from Sections 2 to 4 and 7 to 10. The proofs were not checked here. A public Lean development reports a counterexample to a step in the proof of Lemma 4.2 (Section 6, pp. 14--17), which Sections 7 and 10 use; the claim page [[../wiki/problems/integer_sequences/E0587/claims/2008_11_09_nguyen_vu|of Nguyen and Vu]] records that report and the development's corrected route to the bound of Theorem 1.4, neither built nor audited here.
Dependencies
None in the corpus. External inputs named by the paper include the Szemerédi--Vu theorem on progressions in subset sums (Lemma 2.3, p. 4), Freiman-type inverse theorems (Lemmas 3.2 to 3.4, p. 6) and Ruzsa's covering lemma (Lemma 3.1, p. 6).
Source. H. H. Nguyen and V. H. Vu, Squares in sumsets, in An Irregular Mind, Bolyai Soc. Math. Stud. 21, Springer (2010), 491--524, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14444-8_14; arXiv:0811.1311v2, whose labels and pages are used here; the edition read is named on the source card.
Bears on
- Problem 587: through its case , Theorem 1.4, the theorem gives the upper bound for the largest subset of with no square subset sum.