Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
arXiv v5, p. 42 (journal p. 471): "Proposition 6.1. For any and any it holds that ."
The paper introduces it as "the best lower bound we are aware of", obtained "by an argument in [Sol05] (also present in [BGS17]), a variant of which we sketch below" ([Sol05] Solymosi, On distinct consecutive differences, arXiv:math/0503069; [BGS17] Balog, Granville and Solymosi, Gaps between fractional parts, and additive combinatorics). Section 6.2 records that essentially the best available upper bound for the minimum is the identity permutation's , extended in Example 6.2 to permutations of "bounded complexity"; Section 6.3 (p. 44; journal p. 474) asks Question 3: "Is it true that [sic] ? That is, is it true that for any there exists such that for any the bound holds for all ?" (the print's "" is ), and Question 4: "Does there exist an absolute constant such that for any the bound holds for all ?", noting that "It is not the case that is minimised for the trivial permutation , but none of the examples known to the author are significantly worse."
Source. Jakub Konieczny, On consecutive sums in permutations, arXiv:1504.07156v5 (27 August 2021), pp. 42--44; J. Combinatorics 12 (2021), no. 3, 413--477, pp. 471--474. The wording is identical in both editions. Library home: konieczny_2015_consecutive_sums_permutations.
Read depth. Claims checked: the proposition and Questions 3--4 were read clause by clause in the text layer of the arXiv v5 and on the journal pages; the one-page proof was read for structure and not checked; nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
Page 42. Split into the sets of sums in . For and each , one of , exceeds , and the least with puts one sum in and a neighbor in ; since for , this gives (display (134)), and summing over with yields .
Dependencies
The elementary difference-set inequality above; the argument follows Solymosi's.
Bears on
- Problem 34: the site's and its two expectations, "it may be true that , or even ", are Questions 3 and 4; the problem page records an unreviewed 2026 proof claim on the site's tab that asserts a construction with along a sequence.