Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Theorem (p. 62, unnumbered, quoted). "Let p1>…>pk2p_1>\ldots>p_{k^2}, and II an interval of length ≥3p1\geq3p_1. Then II contains at least 61/2k6^{1/2}k distinct multiples of the pp's." The pp's are primes, as in the Erdős–Selfridge theorem just before it ("Let now again", p. 62).

Erdős presents it as a much weaker result: for intervals of length at least 3p13p_1 he says he loses control over the distinct multiples, that such an interval may well contain more than ck2ck^2 of them, and that he is sure the bound 61/2k6^{1/2}k is not best possible (p. 62). By the Erdős–Selfridge theorem the threshold 3p13p_1 cannot be lowered to (3−ϵ)p1(3-\epsilon)p_1, since 2k<61/2k2k<6^{1/2}k (an observation made here).

Source. P. Erdős, Some problems on number theory, Analytic and Elementary Number Theory (Marseille, 1983), Publ. Math. Orsay 86-1 (1986), 53--67: statement and proof on printed p. 62. The edition read is identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the proof's structure were read clause by clause on the printed page, and the final inequality was checked (see the proof pointer). Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Page 62. The interval holds at least 3k23k^2 multiples of the pp's counted with multiplicity. Take mm in II divisible by the largest possible number rr of the pp's; each of those rr primes has two further multiples in II near mm, giving 2r+12r+1 distinct multiples, while the count with multiplicity gives at least 3k2/r3k^2/r distinct ones. The print concludes with "min⁡(3k2r,2r+1)>61/2k\min\left(\frac{3k^2}{r},2r+1\right)>6^{1/2}k" [sic]: the two counts give at least max⁡(3k2/r,2r+1)\max(3k^2/r,2r+1) distinct multiples, and the maximum exceeds 61/2k6^{1/2}k because the product (3k2/r)(2r+1)(3k^2/r)(2r+1) exceeds 6k26k^2, while the minimum can be small (it is 33 at r=1r=1) (a check made here).

Dependencies

None beyond counting multiples in an interval.

Bears on

  • Problem 1143: in the problem's notation (primes p1<⋯<pup_1<\cdots<p_u, so pup_u is the largest), take u=k2u=k^2. A run of K≥3pu+1K\ge3p_u+1 consecutive positive integers is an interval of length K−1≥3puK-1\ge3p_u, so it contains at least 61/2k=(6u)1/26^{1/2}k=(6u)^{1/2} integers divisible by at least one of the pip_i, that is FK(p1,…,pu)≥(6u)1/2F_K(p_1,\ldots,p_u)\ge(6u)^{1/2} (a deduction made here). This is a lower bound in the range α≥3\alpha\ge3, for uu a perfect square; it does not determine FF.

Problem 650 is not covered: its f(m)f(m) is attained at intervals of length 2max⁡A2\max A, shorter than the 3p13p_1 this theorem needs.