Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Notation (p. 204): Γ(N)\Gamma(N) is the set of the subsets of {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\}, A(N)A(N) counts the elements of AA up to NN, and [x][x] is the integer part.

Theorem 4 (pp. 210--211, quoted with its displays). "Let α>1\alpha>1 be any irrational number. Then there exist infinitely many positive integers NN such that"

A⊂Γ(N),(19)A\subset\Gamma(N),\qquad(19) A(N)>α1/2N1/2(20)A(N)>\alpha^{1/2}N^{1/2}\qquad(20)

"imply the solvability of"

ax−ay=[zα].(21)a_x-a_y=[z\alpha].\qquad(21)

For each such NN the implication holds for every AA satisfying (19) and (20). The paper adds (p. 212) that "Theorem 4 is near best possible": the right side of (20) cannot be replaced by a function f(N)f(N) with f(N)=o(N1/2)f(N)=o(N^{1/2}). It gives no proof of that remark.

The section's claims (p. 210). Section 3 opens by stating that for a fixed irrational α>1\alpha>1 the sequence B={[α],[2α],…,[nα],…}B=\{[\alpha],[2\alpha],\ldots,[n\alpha],\ldots\} (18) is a difference intersector set but need not be a sum intersector set. For the second part, take any real β>1\beta>1 with α=3β\alpha=3\beta and A={[β],[4β],…,[(3k−2)β],…}A=\{[\beta],[4\beta],\ldots,[(3k-2)\beta],\ldots\}: then A(N)/N>1/(3β)−1/NA(N)/N>1/(3\beta)-1/N, and every sum ax+aya_x+a_y lies strictly between two consecutive elements of BB, so ax+ay=[nα]a_x+a_y=[n\alpha] is not solvable. The first part is meant to follow from Theorem 4: an infinite AA of positive lower density satisfies (20) for all large NN, so at the infinitely many NN of the theorem its part up to NN gives a solution of (21) (this deduction is not written out in the paper).

Source. P. Erdős and A. Sárközy, On differences and sums of integers, II, Bull. Soc. Math. Grèce (N.S.) 18 (1977), no. 2, 204--223: the example on p. 210, the statement on pp. 210--211, the proof on pp. 211--212 and the remark on p. 212. The edition read is identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, the example and the remark were read clause by clause on the printed pages. The proof was read but not checked step by step. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Pp. 211--212. Take a convergent p/qp/q of α\alpha with 0<α−p/q<1/q20<\alpha-p/q<1/q^2 (22), of which there are infinitely many, and N=pqN=pq (23). Then [iqα]=ip[iq\alpha]=ip for 1≤i≤q1\le i\le q (24). Splitting AA into its residue classes modulo pp, (20) and (22) give a class with at least two elements; their difference is a multiple of pp between 11 and pqpq, hence ip=[zα]ip=[z\alpha] with z=iqz=iq.