Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Notation (p. 204). A={a1<a2<⋯ }A=\{a_1<a_2<\cdots\} and B={b1<b2<⋯ }B=\{b_1<b_2<\cdots\} are strictly increasing sequences of positive integers, A(n)=∣A∩{1,…,n}∣A(n)=\lvert A\cap\{1,\ldots,n\}\rvert, and Γ(N)\Gamma(N) is the set of the subsets of {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\}.

Infinite sets (pp. 204--205). An infinite sequence BB is a difference intersector set if the equation

ax−ay=bz(1)a_x-a_y=b_z\qquad(1)

is solvable for every infinite sequence AA of positive lower asymptotic density, that is, if BB meets the difference set of each such AA. It is a sum intersector set if, for every such AA, the equation

ax+ay=bz(2)a_x+a_y=b_z\qquad(2)

is solvable. The paper adds: "This terminology is due, partly, to R. Tijdeman." (p. 204). Equation (2) places no distinctness condition on xx and yy.

Finite sets (p. 205). For a finite BB inside {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} (printed "B⊂Γ(N)B\subset\Gamma(N)"), BB is again called a difference intersector set if, for A∈Γ(N)A\in\Gamma(N),

A(N)>εN(3)A(N)>\varepsilon N\qquad(3)

implies the solvability of (1) "if NN is large in terms of ε\varepsilon". For sum intersector sets (3) is replaced by A([N/2])>εNA([N/2])>\varepsilon N, since two elements of AA above [N/2][N/2] have a sum above NN, out of reach of BB.

Examples quoted from Sárközy (pp. 205--206). The squares {12,22,…}\{1^2,2^2,\ldots\} and the shifted primes {2−1,3−1,5−1,…,p−1,…}\{2-1,3-1,5-1,\ldots,p-1,\ldots\} are difference intersector sets, by Sárközy's quantitative Theorems 1 and 2 (the paper's references [3] and [5]): for large NN and A∈Γ(N)A\in\Gamma(N), the bound A(N)>c1N(log⁡2N)2/3/(log⁡N)1/3A(N)>c_1N(\log_2N)^{2/3}/(\log N)^{1/3} gives a solution of ax−ay=z2a_x-a_y=z^2 with z>0z>0, and A(N)>c2N(log⁡3N)3log⁡4N/(log⁡2N)2A(N)>c_2N(\log_3N)^3\log_4N/(\log_2N)^2 gives a solution of ax−ay=p−1a_x-a_y=p-1, where log⁡kx\log_kx is the kk-fold iterated logarithm and c1,c2c_1,c_2 are positive absolute constants. These are results of the cited papers and are not proved in this one.

Source. P. Erdős and A. Sárközy, On differences and sums of integers, II, Bull. Soc. Math. Grèce (N.S.) 18 (1977), no. 2, 204--223: the notation and definitions on pp. 204--205, Theorems 1 and 2 on pp. 205--206. The edition read is identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the definitions and the statements of Theorems 1 and 2 were read clause by clause on the printed pages. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on

  • Problem 439: the problem asks whether every finite coloring of the integers has a monochromatic pair x≠yx\ne y with x+yx+y a square. These definitions are the density notions the paper works with; it shows on p. 209 that the squares are not a sum intersector set (the p. 209 remark). The paper does not pose the coloring question.