Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Notation (p. 251): pkp_k is the kkth prime.

The question (p. 256), restated. The paper asks whether the lower density ("untere Dichte") of the set of kk with

pkk<pk+1k+1,\frac{p_k}{k}<\frac{p_{k+1}}{k+1},

respectively of the set of kk with pk/k>pk+1/(k+1)p_k/k>p_{k+1}/(k+1), is positive.

The second set (p. 256). For the kk with pk/k>pk+1/(k+1)p_k/k>p_{k+1}/(k+1) the paper gives a short argument that the answer is yes. This inequality is equivalent to k(pk+1−pk)<pkk(p_{k+1}-p_k)<p_k. As in the proof of Satz 1, the pkp_k with pk+1−pk<(1−δ)log⁡kp_{k+1}-p_k<(1-\delta)\log k have positive density when δ>0\delta>0 is chosen small enough (independently of kk); since pk>(1−δ)klog⁡kp_k>(1-\delta)k\log k for all sufficiently large kk, each such kk has k(pk+1−pk)<pkk(p_{k+1}-p_k)<p_k.

The first set (p. 256). The paper closes the paragraph with the remark that it "scheint schwierig zu sein, zu beweisen, daß die kk mit pkk<pk+1k+1\frac{p_k}{k}<\frac{p_{k+1}}{k+1} positive untere Dichte haben" (it seems difficult to prove that the kk with pk/k<pk+1/(k+1)p_k/k<p_{k+1}/(k+1) have positive lower density). The paper proves nothing about this set's density.

Other problems on the same pages (pp. 255--256), recorded for completeness. The paper conjectures that for each ε\varepsilon there is an l=l(ε)l=l(\varepsilon) such that, for all pk<xp_k<x except εx/log⁡x\varepsilon x/\log x values of kk, pk/k<max⁡1≤i≤lpk+i/(k+i)p_k/k<\max_{1\le i\le l}p_{k+i}/(k+i) (its (15), p. 255); it conjectures that no kk, or only finitely many, satisfy max⁡1≤i<kpk−i/(k−i)<pk/k<min⁡1≤i<∞pk+i/(k+i)\max_{1\le i<k}p_{k-i}/(k-i)<p_k/k<\min_{1\le i<\infty}p_{k+i}/(k+i) (p. 256); and it asks whether pk/k>pk+1/(k+1)>pk+2/(k+2)p_k/k>p_{k+1}/(k+1)>p_{k+2}/(k+2) can occur infinitely often (p. 256).

Source. P. Erdős and K. Prachar, Sätze und Probleme über pk/kp_k/k, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 25 (1961/1962), 251--256, doi:10.1007/BF02992930; the question, the argument for the second set and the remark on the first set on p. 256, conjecture (15) on p. 255. The edition read is identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the question, the argument for the second set and the remark on the first were read clause by clause on the print. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Dependencies

The short-gap count from the proof of Satz 1 and the prime number theorem.

Bears on

  • Problem 968: the problem asks whether the set of nn with pn/n<pn+1/(n+1)p_n/n<p_{n+1}/(n+1) has positive density, and its precise statement asks for positive lower density, which is this question for the first set. The paper answers the companion question for the set with pk/k>pk+1/(k+1)p_k/k>p_{k+1}/(k+1) and leaves the first set open, remarking only that it seems difficult.