Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
A sequence of positive integers has Property P if for (p. 1, Erdős and Sárközy's definition). Theorem (p. 1). The set of displays (1)--(2) below has Property P, and its counting function satisfies
Here counts the elements of below , as the paper's (p. 1) does, and, by the paper's notation (Section 2, p. 2), means that there is a constant with for all sufficiently large ; the bound therefore holds for every large , not only along a sequence.
The construction (displays (1)--(2), p. 2): with , where runs over the products of exactly distinct primes and is the -th prime in the class modulo ; the factor is an indicator of the set that keeps the union in Property P.
Source. C. Elsholtz and S. Planitzer, On Erdős and Sárközy's sequences with Property P, Monatsh. Math. 182 (2017), no. 3, 565--575, DOI 10.1007/s00605-016-0995-9 (published online 18 October 2016; Crossref record read). The copy read for this page is arXiv:1609.07935v1 (26 September 2016, 8 pp.), whose pagination is used here; the journal text was not compared. The Theorem on p. 1 and the construction on p. 2, read in the text layer and on the page images.
Read depth. Claims checked: the definition, the Theorem, displays (1)--(2) and the statements of Lemmas 1 and 2 were read clause by clause in the text layer and on the page images. Section 3 (Property P of the union, Lemmas 1 and 2), Section 4 (products of distinct primes, Lemma A and Corollary 1) and Section 5 (the counting function, with the proof of the Theorem) were read for their structure and not checked step by step.
Proof pointer
Section 3: Lemma 1 (p. 2) shows that if a prime divides but not , then , because is a quadratic non-residue modulo ; Lemma 2 (p. 3) deduces that any union of the sets has Property P, through the indicator when the three elements do not all lie in one and through their equal number of prime factors when they do. Section 4 bounds from below the number of squarefree integers up to with exactly prime factors, all , for near (Corollary 1, p. 3, from Lemma A). Section 5 (pp. 5--7) gives for every with , and sums these bounds (p. 7). Not reconstructed here.
Dependencies
Lemma A (p. 3), the special case of X. Meng's Lemma 9 (cited as the arXiv preprint 1607.01882) for squarefree integers with prime factors, all , uniformly for ; the computed bounds of Languasco and Zaccagnini and bounds on the Gamma function and its derivatives obtained with Mathematica (p. 4); Mertens' and Stirling's formulas; the asymptotic for the -th prime (p. 5); and the fact that is a quadratic non-residue modulo a prime .
Bears on
- Problem 12: Property P with is the problem's condition (no element divides the sum of two distinct larger elements), so is a set of the kind the problem asks about, with counting function for all large , the bound the site's commentary credits to Elsholtz and Planitzer. The bound is below , so it gives neither the first question's positive liminf against nor a set with at least elements up to for every , and the theorem says nothing about reciprocal sums; it answers none of the problem's three questions. The larger counting functions of the 2026 constructions are pending claims recorded on the problem page.