Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. On an edge-deletion problem of Erdős, Hajnal and Szemerédi, the seven-page exposition hosted by Bloom (https://www.erdosproblems.com/static/74-proof.pdf, accessed 2026-09-05), unnumbered joining lemma, pp. 3–4. The source's case verification is expanded below.

Statement. Let h:V(G)→Nh:V(G)\to\mathbb N satisfy ∣h(u)−h(v)∣≤1|h(u)-h(v)|\leq1 on every edge. Let a,b:V(G)→{0,1,2}a,b:V(G)\to\{0,1,2\}, where aa is proper on G[{h≤t+2}]G[\{h\leq t+2\}] and bb is proper on G[{h≥t}]G[\{h\geq t\}]. Assume a≠2a\ne2 at heights t,t+1,t+2t,t+1,t+2, and b≠2b\ne2 at heights t,t+1,t+2,t+3t,t+1,t+2,t+3. There is a proper three-coloring cc agreeing with aa on {h≤t}\{h\leq t\} and with bb on {h≥t+3}\{h\geq t+3\}, and satisfying

c(v)=2⟹h(v)≤t+2 or b(v)=2.c(v)=2\quad\Longrightarrow\quad h(v)\leq t+2\ \text{or}\ b(v)=2.

Proof scope. Complete rewritten proof with the finite color cases made explicit; no external theorem is needed.

Proof. Use c=ac=a below and including level tt, and c=bc=b at and above level t+3t+3. Define the two intermediate levels by this table:

(a(v),b(v))(a(v),b(v))c(v)c(v) at t+1t+1c(v)c(v) at t+2t+2
(0,0)(0,0)0000
(0,1)(0,1)0011
(1,0)(1,0)2222
(1,1)(1,1)1111

All entries are defined because both input colors are binary there. Edges wholly in {h≤t}\{h\leq t\} or {h≥t+3}\{h\geq t+3\} remain proper. No edge can skip a height level.

For an edge within either intermediate level, or between these two levels, both aa and bb are proper and binary at its endpoints. Their ordered color pairs must therefore be (0,0),(1,1)(0,0),(1,1) or (0,1),(1,0)(0,1),(1,0), in either order. The first pair receives 00 and 11 on either level. For the second pair, the (1,0)(1,0) endpoint receives 22 on either level, and the other receives 00 or 11. So these edges are proper.

For an edge from height tt to height t+1t+1, the table's color at the upper endpoint is either its aa-color or 22. The lower endpoint uses its binary aa-color, different from the upper endpoint's aa-color. For an edge from height t+2t+2 to height t+3t+3, the table's color at the lower endpoint is either its bb-color or 22. The upper endpoint uses its binary bb-color, different from the lower endpoint's bb-color. This proves properness at both boundaries without assuming aa is proper or binary on level t+3t+3. Every edge has now been considered. Finally, above t+2t+2 the resulting color is exactly bb, which proves the asserted location of color 22.

Use. The height is truncated distance from the endpoints of earlier deletions in Proposition 4.1.

Bears on. Problem 74.