Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Setting (p. 638). For an odd prime ,
By Kummer's theorem, exactly when every base- digit of lies in .
Lemma 1 (p. 638), quoted: "For each odd prime and all real numbers , the number of integers with is at most ."
For the paper notes (p. 638) that is always even.
Heuristic that follows (p. 639, unlabeled, not a theorem). Reading Lemma 1 as a probability, at most when is an integer, that for random in , with greater than , and for , and assuming the events for different primes independent, the paper expects at least integers with coprime to . The same heuristic for the four primes suggests only finitely many with coprime to , such as ; the paper reports that no larger example is known, though the search has gone up to , citing Mauldin and Ulam.
Context the paper gives (p. 638). The numbers have coprime to ; whether there are infinitely many is Graham's problem, with a prize as reported in the paper's references [2, 4]. For a product of two odd primes, is coprime to for infinitely many , a result of Erdős, Graham, Ruzsa and Straus (1975).
Source. Carl Pomerance, Divisors of the middle binomial coefficient, Amer. Math. Monthly 122 (2015), no. 7, 636--644, doi:10.4169/amer.math.monthly.122.7.636: the setting, Lemma 1 and its proof in Section 4 (pp. 638--639), the heuristic on p. 639. The edition read is identified on the source card.
Read depth. Claims checked: the setting, the statement and the proof were read clause by clause on the printed pages. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
Pages 638--639. With , every has at most base- digits, and restricting each to leaves at most choices.
Dependencies
Kummer's theorem (Section 3, p. 637).
Bears on
- Problem 376: the problem asks whether infinitely many have coprime to . Lemma 1 bounds, for each of separately, how many escape divisibility by ; it gives no lower bound and says nothing about the three primes jointly. The independence heuristic built on it predicts infinitely many such but is not a proof, and the paper does not settle the problem.