Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
For integers and ,
Ecklund prints the lemma with the single hypothesis (pp.267--268). The condition is the range of his theorem, in which he applies the lemma, and the proof below uses it to place in the domain of (1).
Proof
Use the upper estimate (2) at and the lower estimate (1) at from [[factorials_binomials/ecklundjr_1969_prime_divisors_binomial_coefficient/external_inputs|the external-input record]]. Their domains hold because . Thus
Since , replacing both occurrences of in the subtracted positive term by the larger only increases the right-hand side. Multiplication by therefore gives
Exponentiating proves (7).
Verification record
Current review state. Accepted by independent mathematical review (retained as the full-proof review), relative to the two premises named below. Substantive changes to this proof or those premises invalidate the affected scope until rechecked.
Scope and source version. The checked scope is equation (7), both strict inequalities, the threshold , the domains at and , and the logarithm replacement. The statement and proof are on printed pp.267--268 / physical pp.2--3 of Ecklund's Pacific Journal of Mathematics 29 (1969), 267--270 publisher PDF, identified on the source card.
Premises and limits. The component assumes exactly Rosser--Schoenfeld estimates (1) and (2) as quoted in Ecklund. Their proofs were not recursively reconstructed or reviewed. No gap remains in the deduction from those premises. No formal verification is recorded.