Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Section 3, printed p. 126 (published original).
Statement
A vertex of the matching dual feasible polyhedron has at most positive coordinates. A certificate satisfying Theorem M need not itself be a dual vertex and need not satisfy that support bound.
Proof
Write the dual as , where there is one domination inequality for each original edge. Suppose a feasible has positive coordinates, indexed by . The corresponding columns of the matrix acting on are linearly dependent. Hence there is a nonzero vector , supported on , with .
Choose so small that , possible since all coordinates in are strictly positive. Both vectors satisfy the same domination inequalities as , and they are distinct. Their midpoint is , so is not a vertex. This proves the bound for vertices.
For the limit of that inference, take two vertices joined by one edge of weight . Set both node weights to , use the matching consisting of that edge, and make no contractions. Every condition of Theorem M holds. Its dual is , with no odd-set variable. It has objective , equal to the matching weight, and two positive coordinates although . It is the midpoint of the feasible optimal vectors and , so it is not a vertex.
The source first states the correct dual-vertex fact and then attributes a support bound to the vectors with which it will deal. That does not follow for every structural certificate, as the example shows. The main equality-certificate proof needs no such sparsity assumption. This qualification is not a counterexample to Theorem P or Theorem M.