Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Notation (p. 263). is a graph with vertices and edges. A graph is -connected when every two of its edges lie together on an even cycle of that graph of length at most ; is the largest integer such that, for all sufficiently large , every has a -connected subgraph with at least edges. So counts edges of subgraphs in which every two edges lie on a -cycle of the subgraph. Proposition 0 (p. 264) identifies these subgraphs, when they have no isolated vertices, as the complete -partite graphs, with every class of size at least when or .
Theorem 1 (p. 264, quoted). "Let be a positive integer and a constant satisfying . Then we have:
where for fixed as ."
The two printed cases overlap at , where ; the first case covers () and (). The display is labeled (1) in the print, a label it shares with the recalled bound (1) of p. 263.
Source. Richard A. Duke, Paul Erdős and Vojtěch Rödl, Cycle-connected graphs, Discrete Math. 108 (1992), 261--278, doi:10.1016/0012-365X(92)90680-E; the notation on printed p. 263, Proposition 0 and Theorem 1 on p. 264, read on the page images of the publisher's scan. The edition read is identified in the source digest.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement was read clause by clause on the page image. The proof (pp. 264--267) was read for structure only.
Proof pointer
Pages 264--267. Lower bound: a graph with edges has many stars with leaves, so some -set of vertices is the leaf set of about of them, and the centres with those vertices span a complete bipartite graph with edges. Upper bound: in the random graph with edge probability , a first-moment count, split by the size of the smaller side at the threshold , excludes complete bipartite subgraphs with edges, and a Claim (p. 266) reduces complete -partite subgraphs, , to the bipartite case.
Dependencies
Proposition 0 (p. 264), the characterization of -connected graphs.
Bears on
- Problem 584: if either clause of the problem demanded that every two edges of the subgraph lie on a -cycle of the subgraph, a graph with edges, a constant, would be guaranteed only a subgraph whose edge count is linear in , by this theorem. The problem asks for cycles of length at most , with -cycles only for two edges sharing a vertex, or of length at most , and neither clause is addressed by the theorem.