Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

"Theorem 1.3. There exists a constant c>0c>0 such that for any probability p:=p(n)p:=p(n) the random graph G(n,p)G(n,p) a.a.s. can be decomposed into at most cncn cycles and edges."

G(n,p)G(n,p) takes each of the (n2)\binom n2 potential edges independently with probability pp, and a.a.s. means with probability tending to 11 as n→∞n\to\infty (the paper's definitions, p. 609). The constant cc is absolute, the same for every p=p(n)p=p(n).

Source. D. Conlon, J. Fox and B. Sudakov, Cycle packing, Random Structures Algorithms 45 (2014), no. 4, 608--626, doi:10.1002/rsa.20574; printed p. 609 = PDF p. 2 of the publisher's version, read on the page image. The artifact is identified in the source digest.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the definitions were read clause by clause on the page image of p. 609. The proof (Section 4) was not read.

Proof pointer

Section 4 (pp. 615--617; the proof of Theorem 1.3 is on pp. 616--617), using the expansion properties of random graphs; not reconstructed here. Bucić and Montgomery (p. 2) record the later sharper results of Korándi, Krivelevich and Sudakov (the constant 14+p2+o(1)\tfrac14+\tfrac p2+o(1)) and of Glock, Kühn and Osthus (the exact minimum for constant pp), neither held here.

Dependencies

Internal lemmas of the paper.

Bears on

  • Problem 184: the conjecture holds for typical random graphs; a special class, not the general statement.