Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Write f(G)f(G) for the largest edge count of a bipartite subgraph of GG (p. 1). Theorem 1.2 (p. 2). Some absolute constant c′>0c'>0 makes every triangle-free graph GG with e>1e>1 edges satisfy

f(G)≥e2+c′e4/5.(4)f(G)\ge\frac e2+c'e^{4/5}. \tag{4}

Up to the value of the constant this bound is sharp: for some absolute constant C′>0C'>0, each ee is the edge count of a triangle-free graph GG with

f(G)≤e2+C′e4/5.f(G)\le\frac e2+C'e^{4/5}.

Context on p. 2: Erdős and Lovász (cited through Erdős's Waterloo 1977 paper, the note's [6]) showed f(G)≥e/2+Ω(e2/3(log⁡e/log⁡log⁡e)1/3)f(G)\ge e/2+\Omega(e^{2/3}(\log e/\log\log e)^{1/3}) for triangle-free GG; Poljak and Tuza improved it by a logarithmic factor; Shearer proved f(G)≥e/2+Ω(e3/4)f(G)\ge e/2+\Omega(e^{3/4}), display (3); "In the next theorem we improve the exponent 3/43/4 to 4/54/5 and show that this is tight." The Note added in proof (p. 8) records that Shearer independently, and earlier, proved the lower bound with e4/5−ϵe^{4/5-\epsilon} for every ϵ>0\epsilon>0.

In the site's notation. With f(m)f(m) the largest kk such that every triangle-free graph with mm edges contains a bipartite subgraph with kk edges, the theorem gives m/2+c′m4/5≤f(m)≤m/2+C′m4/5m/2+c'm^{4/5}\le f(m)\le m/2+C'm^{4/5} for every m>1m>1 (the upper bound from the tightness half at e=me=m), which is the site's display with c1=c′c_1=c' and c2=C′c_2=C'; the constants are not made explicit for the lower bound, and the sharpness construction (Proposition 3.2) gives 9⋅22/5+o(1)9\cdot2^{2/5}+o(1) along its sequence.

Source. N. Alon, Bipartite subgraphs, Combinatorica 16 (1996), no. 3, 301--311, doi:10.1007/BF01261315 (Crossref record read: issued September 1996); the author's final version read for this card ("appeared in Combinatorica 16 (1996), 301-311" on its p. 1; byte-identical to the Princeton copy per the card), Theorem 1.2 on its p. 2, proof on pp. 5--7 (Section 3), read on the page images of pp. 2 and 7 and in the text layer of pp. 5--6. The journal pagination was not attached to the preprint's pages.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, its two halves and the p. 2 context were read clause by clause on the page image; the proof of the lower bound (pp. 5--6) was read for structure in the text layer and not checked; the sharpness half is Proposition 3.2 (p. 7, page image), whose deduction to "for every ee" is stated on p. 7 in one sentence and not checked here.

Proof pointer

Section 3, pp. 5--7. Lower bound (pp. 5--6): put d=⌊e2/5⌋d=\lfloor e^{2/5}\rfloor. Case 1, GG has no subgraph of minimum degree at least dd: a degeneracy ordering gives ∑vd(v)>e/d=Ω(e4/5)\sum_v\sqrt{d(v)}>e/\sqrt d=\Omega(e^{4/5}), and Shearer's inequality (8), f(G)≥e/2+182∑idif(G)\ge e/2+\tfrac1{8\sqrt2}\sum_i\sqrt{d_i} for triangle-free GG (quoted from his paper, the note's [16]), gives (4). Case 2, an induced subgraph HH on mm vertices has minimum degree at least dd: a random set RR of at most r=⌈2m/d⌉r=\lceil2m/d\rceil vertices of HH leaves an induced subgraph H′H' with at least md/4md/4 edges whose vertices all have a neighbor in RR; coloring each vertex by its smallest neighbor in RR is a proper rr-coloring because GG is triangle-free; Lemma 2.1 (the rr-colorable cut lemma of Section 2) gives a bipartition of V(H′)V(H') with surplus e(H′)/(2r)=Ω(d2)=Ω(e4/5)e(H')/(2r)=\Omega(d^2)=\Omega(e^{4/5}), and the remaining vertices are assigned greedily to the side where they have fewer neighbors, keeping at least half of the remaining edges. Upper bound (pp. 6--7): Lemma 3.1 (f(G)≤(d−λn)n/4f(G)\le(d-\lambda_n)n/4 for a dd-regular graph with least eigenvalue λn\lambda_n, by a quadratic-form computation) applied to the explicit triangle-free regular graphs of the author's 1994 construction (its [1]).

Dependencies

Same paper: Lemma 2.1 (p. 3), Lemma 3.1 (p. 6) and Proposition 3.2 (p. 7). External: Shearer's inequality (8) (the paper's [16]) for the lower bound; the explicit triangle-free graphs with extremal spectral properties from the author's 1994 Electronic J. Combin. paper (its [1]) for the upper bound. Neither external input was checked here.

Bears on

  • Problem 581: the status-defining theorem; it determines f(m)f(m) to the order m/2+Θ(m4/5)m/2+\Theta(m^{4/5}), not exactly, which is what the site's SOLVED records.