Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Use the admissible paths and positive nondecreasing thresholds of good paths. Let have maximum degree at most an integer . Let , , and be integers. Let be a family of admissible -paths starting at and ending in . Let be a forbidden vertex set with . Define
If
there are a hub , distinct vertices adjacent to , and injective tails of length , for , such that:
- each tail starts in and ends at ;
- the fronts of all tails, meaning all vertices except the final endpoint, are pairwise disjoint, and contain no ;
- belongs to no tail, and , every , and every tail avoid ;
- belongs to no tail and equals no .
The whole fan uses at most vertices. For one may further require . Zero-length tails with the same endpoint may coincide; their fronts are empty. There is no assertion for positive .
Pinned-coordinate estimates
For and a specified , paths in with number at most . Their proper prefix of length is good, with at most choices; then choose the remaining walk. If also is specified at some , the bound is : the suffix walk has one specified vertex, removing one free choice. This follows by choosing forward to the prescribed coordinate, testing that edge, and continuing. For the good zero-prefix is unique.
There are at most possible values of , by the walk bound. If and
some has more than paths pinned at . For , each excluded value in costs at most . For none is excluded, since . After this deletion, more than paths remain; averaging over at most values proves the assertion.
Positive tails
Suppose , and put , so and . Use (2) with to choose a hub and a pinned family with and
Give the row and the label set . Its labels are nonempty, have exactly members, and exclude the row. There are at most rows, all neighbors of . A vertex in the whole row-plus-label set has at most
incidences, by summing the two-coordinate bound over its possible positions. Within a fixed row, a vertex has label incidence at most
Indeed, now use the good prefix ending at that row and pin one later coordinate. The row-fan cost in finite selection is bounded by
Here , , and . Thus (3) yields disjoint row fans with arms. Take their rows as , and reverse each selected suffix to obtain a tail from to .
Its front is exactly its old label set. Disjoint row-fan whole sets, and disjoint labels within each row, prove both front disjointness and avoidance of every old vertex. Each selected path is injective: its vertex at index is outside its entire later suffix, and its vertex at index zero is outside the suffix since . These observations prove the hub and initial-vertex exclusions, including when and . All selected row-fan whole sets avoid , so all tails and old vertices do also.
Zero tails
For the smaller hypothesis
suffices. Pin coordinate using (2) with . Some is the penultimate vertex of more than paths. Each possible endpoint accounts for at most paths, since their proper prefixes from to are good. After discarding endpoints in , more than paths remain. Choose distinct endpoints ; each is adjacent to and belongs to . Use the constant zero-tail at for every . The fronts are empty. Injectivity of the original paths gives and , the latter because . All the stated conditions follow. Finally, (1) implies both (3)'s required starting hypothesis and (4); the union of one hub, old vertices, and fronts of size at most has the claimed size.
Source and scope
Complete reconstruction of AdmissibleSuffixCounts,
AdmissiblePinnedSelection, AdmissibleSuffixFans,
AdmissibleEndSelection, and SuffixFanData.zero, positive, and
choose, pinned Lean lines 8650–8814 and 8919–9365. It fills the fan
selection implicit in the exposition,
p. 5. The symbols here are the source's cost and budget, not
model parameters.
Used by. Heavy-path assembly.
Bears on. #571.