Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Fix , , and an integer such that . Suppose every nonempty subgraph of a finite simple graph , with an integer satisfying
also satisfies . Then
If the degree hypothesis is available only for bipartite subgraphs, the conclusion is . Here the graphs under consideration may be required to avoid a fixed graph, since avoidance passes to every subgraph. A suitable exists for each fixed .
Proof
For a finite set of real weights, averaging over all -element subsets shows that some subset has weight at least times the total. We first apply this to a graph on vertices for which
For of size , weight a vertex by its number of neighbors in . The total weight is . Choose an -element set carrying at least of that weight. The ordered adjacencies from to are at most . This remains true if overlap, since each undirected edge contributes at most twice. Consequently
and therefore
Put and let now consist of the vertices with . The degree sum implies . If , (1) and the choice of give
The same inequality holds for . Delete . The remaining induced graph has at least edges and maximum degree at most . Define
Repeatedly delete a vertex of current degree less than . Each deletion loses at most edges; all deletions together lose at most . Thus the final graph is nonempty, indeed has more than edges, and
This proves the needed degree trimming, including the ceiling case when is an integer.
If has no edges the theorem is immediate. Otherwise choose, among its nonempty induced subgraphs, one maximizing . Write that maximum as , and write . Then has the density property used above and . Apply (2) and the assumed degree bound to its subgraph :
Since , , proving the assertion. The empty graph also satisfies it, with its edge count zero.
Finally, give each vertex an independent uniform color in . Each edge crosses the resulting cut with probability , so a bipartite spanning subgraph has at least half the edges of . Apply the first part to this subgraph. Its further subgraphs remain bipartite, and the extra factor is exactly two. Since , an integer satisfying the stated inequality exists.
Source and scope
Complete reconstruction of Regularization.weighted_subset,
capture_degree_mass, small_set_degree_mass, high_degree_mass,
minimum_degree_core, almost_regular_of_density_max, maximum_density,
and edge_bound_of_almost_regular, pinned Lean lines 894–1367, together
with MaxCut.exists_bipartite_subgraph, lines 1368–1474. The
exposition, Proposition 4.1,
pp. 4–5, only announces the regularization step.
Used by. Suspension upper bound; Proposition 4.1.
Bears on. #571.