Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

For all integers b≥a≥1b\ge a\ge1, a model for (a,b)(a,b) exists.

Proof

We first record the integer division step. If 0<p<b0<p<b, there are integers k≥0k\ge0 and 0≤r<p0\le r<p such that

b+r=(k+2)p.(1)b+r=(k+2)p. \tag{1}

Write b=qp+sb=qp+s with 0≤s<p0\le s<p. If s=0s=0, then b>pb>p gives q≥2q\ge2; take k=q−2k=q-2 and r=0r=0. If s>0s>0, then q≥1q\ge1; take k=q−1k=q-1 and r=p−sr=p-s, which satisfies 0<r<p0<r<p. These choices prove (1) in both cases.

Now use strong induction on bb. If a=ba=b, the diagonal base model applies. If a<ba<b, put p=b−ap=b-a. Then 0<p<b0<p<b. Choose k,rk,r by (1). Since 1≤p−r≤p<b1\le p-r\le p<b, the induction hypothesis supplies a model for (p−r,p)(p-r,p). Apply Proposition 4.2 with parameter kk. The new pair is

(p−r)+kp=(k+1)p−r=b−p=a,(p−r)+(k+1)p=(k+2)p−r=b.\begin{aligned} (p-r)+kp&=(k+1)p-r=b-p=a,\\ (p-r)+(k+1)p&=(k+2)p-r=b. \end{aligned}

Thus it is a model for (a,b)(a,b). The induction strictly reduces the second parameter, and k=0k=0 is allowed through the separately proved suspension case. No coprimality assumption is used or needed.

Source and scope

Exposition, Lemma 5.1, p. 6; UniversalHubModels.negative_step and all_models, pinned Lean lines 10307–10347. The parameter rr here is a remainder correction and is unrelated to the path length used in the pruning lemmas.

Used by. Theorem 1.1.

Bears on. #571.