Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Setting. and are as in Theorem I and Theorem II.
Theorem IV (p. 258). As ,
The exponent is set small in the scan of p. 258; it is read as because the same glyph appears in (8.3) on p. 266, the bound the proof reduces Theorem IV to, and in the step , hence , on the same page.
Source. P. Erdős and L. Mirsky, The distribution of values of the divisor function , Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 2 (1952), 257--271; Theorem IV on p. 258, its proof in §§8--10, pp. 265--269. The copy read is identified on the source card.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement was read on the page images, with the exponent fixed as described above, and the proof was read in outline; its estimates were not re-derived. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
§§8--10, pp. 265--269. Write (8.1), where counts the D-numbers whose B-number exceeds ; such an has an exponent with composite (a critical exponent, at a critical prime ). Those with a critical prime below are counted directly with Lemmas 1 and 2 (p. 260) and are few compared with by Theorem I. For the rest, every critical exponent equals (p. 266); grouping them by their part with exponents above (the kernel), each kernel carries of them (9.4), so (9.13) bounds , while §10 shows each such kernel is the kernel of many B-numbers up to (10.1), which gives (8.3) and so Theorem IV with (6.5).
Dependencies
Theorem I, the inequality (6.5) from the proof of Theorem II, and Lemmas 1 and 2 (p. 260) of the same paper.
Bears on
No Erdős problem in the corpus.