Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Problem 10, p. 7 (Section 4, "Higher dimensions", pp. 6--8), with Theorem 4.1 (p. 7), of Adam Sheffer, Distinct Distances: Open Problems and Current Bounds, arXiv:1406.1949v3 (2 July 2018), the edition read for the source card.

Statement

Notation (p. 6). Dd(n)D_d(n) is the least number of distinct distances that a set of nn points in Rd\mathbb R^d can determine. In Ω∗(⋅)\Omega^*(\cdot) polylogarithmic factors are neglected (p. 7, footnote 2).

Problem 10 (p. 7). "Find the asymptotic value of Dd(n)D_d(n)." (quoted)

What the survey records (pp. 6--7), none of it proved in the survey:

  • Upper bound: an n1/d×⋯×n1/dn^{1/d}\times\cdots\times n^{1/d} section of Zd\mathbb Z^d gives Dd(n)=O(n2/d)D_d(n)=O(n^{2/d}) for d≥3d\ge3, observed by Erdős in 1946 and conjectured to be tight. (The survey's p. 6 calls this the "current best lower bound" (quoted); the construction gives an upper bound, and p. 7 treats it as one.)
  • Theorem 4.1 (Solymosi and Vu, p. 7): if Dd0(n)=Ω(nα0)D_{d_0}(n)=\Omega(n^{\alpha_0}), then (i) for all d>d0d>d_0, Dd(n)=Ω(n2d/((d+d0+1)(d−d0)+2d0/α0))D_d(n)=\Omega\bigl(n^{2d/((d+d_0+1)(d-d_0)+2d_0/\alpha_0)}\bigr), and (ii) for all d>d0d>d_0 with d−d0d-d_0 even, Dd(n)=Ω(n2(d+1)/((d+d0+2)(d−d0)+2(d0+1)/α0))D_d(n)=\Omega\bigl(n^{2(d+1)/((d+d_0+2)(d-d_0)+2(d_0+1)/\alpha_0)}\bigr).
  • Current bounds derived from it. Part (i) with D2(n)=Ω(n/log⁡n)D_2(n)=\Omega(n/\log n) as the base case gives D3(n)=Ω∗(n3/5)D_3(n)=\Omega^*(n^{3/5}), against D3(n)=O(n2/3)D_3(n)=O(n^{2/3}) (the survey's footnote 2 says the logarithm does not exactly fit Theorem 4.1 but the proof remains valid). Part (ii) with the base cases D2(n)=Ω∗(n)D_2(n)=\Omega^*(n) and D3(n)=Ω∗(n3/5)D_3(n)=\Omega^*(n^{3/5}) gives, for even d≥4d\ge4, Dd(n)=Ω∗(n(2d+2)/(d2+2d−2))D_d(n)=\Omega^*\bigl(n^{(2d+2)/(d^2+2d-2)}\bigr); for odd d≥5d\ge5, Dd(n)=Ω∗(n(2d+2)/(d2+2d−5/3))D_d(n)=\Omega^*\bigl(n^{(2d+2)/(d^2+2d-5/3)}\bigr). The survey notes that these approach the conjectured Θ(n2/d)\Theta(n^{2/d}) as d→∞d\to\infty.

The introduction (p. 2) names this as one of the two problems the author considers most challenging. The survey adds (p. 7) that Bardwell-Evans and Sheffer reduced the problem to an incidence problem for (d−1)(d-1)-flats in R2d−1\mathbb R^{2d-1}.

Read depth

Claims checked on the print. Theorem 4.1 and the derived bounds are reported as the survey states them and were not checked against their sources here.

Bears on

  • Problem 1083: the problem's fd(n)f_d(n), read as the least number of distinct distances among nn points of Rd\mathbb R^d, is Dd(n)D_d(n) for d≥3d\ge3, and the problem asks whether fd(n)=n2/d−o(1)f_d(n)=n^{2/d-o(1)}. The survey records the conjecture that O(n2/d)O(n^{2/d}) is tight and lower bounds with smaller exponents (for d=3d=3, 3/53/5 against 2/32/3), and leaves the problem open as Problem 10.