Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Problem 10, p. 7 (Section 4, "Higher dimensions", pp. 6--8), with Theorem 4.1 (p. 7), of Adam Sheffer, Distinct Distances: Open Problems and Current Bounds, arXiv:1406.1949v3 (2 July 2018), the edition read for the source card.
Statement
Notation (p. 6). is the least number of distinct distances that a set of points in can determine. In polylogarithmic factors are neglected (p. 7, footnote 2).
Problem 10 (p. 7). "Find the asymptotic value of ." (quoted)
What the survey records (pp. 6--7), none of it proved in the survey:
- Upper bound: an section of gives for , observed by Erdős in 1946 and conjectured to be tight. (The survey's p. 6 calls this the "current best lower bound" (quoted); the construction gives an upper bound, and p. 7 treats it as one.)
- Theorem 4.1 (Solymosi and Vu, p. 7): if , then (i) for all , , and (ii) for all with even, .
- Current bounds derived from it. Part (i) with as the base case gives , against (the survey's footnote 2 says the logarithm does not exactly fit Theorem 4.1 but the proof remains valid). Part (ii) with the base cases and gives, for even , ; for odd , . The survey notes that these approach the conjectured as .
The introduction (p. 2) names this as one of the two problems the author considers most challenging. The survey adds (p. 7) that Bardwell-Evans and Sheffer reduced the problem to an incidence problem for -flats in .
Read depth
Claims checked on the print. Theorem 4.1 and the derived bounds are reported as the survey states them and were not checked against their sources here.
Bears on
- Problem 1083: the problem's , read as the least number of distinct distances among points of , is for , and the problem asks whether . The survey records the conjecture that is tight and lower bounds with smaller exponents (for , against ), and leaves the problem open as Problem 10.