Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. T. Feng, T. Trinh, G. Bingham et al., Semi-Autonomous Mathematics Discovery with Gemini: A Case Study on the Erdős Problems, arXiv:2601.22401v3 (5 February 2026); Section 4.3, the problem and Remark 4.3 on p. 24, the solution on pp. 24--26. The result is unnumbered. The artifact is identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the assertion and the proof (pp. 24--26) were read through on the print; the list of two-distance four-point configurations is asserted in the paper from "elementary observations" (p. 25) and was not checked here, nor was the cited counting theorem. Nothing here is independently reviewed. A preprint.

Statement

Let Λ={m(1,0)+k(12,72):m,k∈Z}\Lambda=\{m(1,0)+k(\tfrac12,\tfrac{\sqrt7}2):m,k\in\mathbb Z\}, the ring of integers of Q(−7)\mathbb Q(\sqrt{-7}) embedded in R2\mathbb R^2, and let PnP_n be the nn points of Λ\Lambda closest to the origin. The paper proves (pp. 24--26) that PnP_n determines O(n/log⁡n)O(n/\sqrt{\log n}) distinct distances and that every 44 distinct points of Λ\Lambda determine at least 33 distinct distances; the answer to the question is affirmative.

Proof pointer

Squared distances in Λ\Lambda are values of the form m2+mk+2k2m^2+mk+2k^2 of discriminant −7-7 up to O(n)O(n), and Bernays's extension of the Landau--Ramanujan theorem counts the integers up to XX so represented as ∼CX/log⁡X\sim CX/\sqrt{\log X} (p. 25). Every planar two-distance four-point set is, by the paper's list, similar to one of six configurations; the isosceles trapezoid needs an irrational squared-distance ratio, and the rest contain a square or an equilateral triangle, neither of which fits in Λ\Lambda because ii and −3\sqrt{-3} are not in Q(−7)\mathbb Q(\sqrt{-7}) (pp. 25--26).

Dependencies

Bernays (1912), the asymptotic count of integers represented by a positive definite binary quadratic form (cited, not held).

Bears on

  • Problem 659: answers the question as posed affirmatively. The paper classifies the case as an independent rediscovery: Remark 4.3 (p. 24) reports essentially the same result in a 2014 blog post of Sheffer, from an argument of Sheffer and Lund that does not treat the trapezoid configuration, and a later full solution by Grayzel.