Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Setting (pp. 1--2). For positive integers and , is the largest such that every set of points in contains points for which all the non-zero volumes of the subsets of order are distinct; . Zero volumes are disregarded because otherwise all points could be placed on a hyperplane of dimension . For every such volume is zero, so the paper calls the polynomial lower bound trivial there.
Theorem 1.2 (p. 2, quoted). "For all integers and with , there exists a positive constant such that ."
Theorem 4.2 (p. 7), the form proved. For an irreducible variety of dimension and degree in (), is the least such that every points of contain points whose non-zero volumes of -element subsets are all distinct, with . For all integers and there are positive integers and such that, for all integers , ; in particular there is a positive constant with . As printed, Theorem 4.2 carries no upper limit on .
Upper bounds (pp. 2--3), from the grid : , and the paper says a slight variant of the argument gives for . These do not match the lower bound.
Further remarks of the paper: in the case the bound improves to Proposition 3.3; §5.1 (p. 8) says that for , defined for sets with no points on a common -dimensional subspace and counting all volumes, the proof can be altered to give for ; and §5.3 (pp. 8--9) says the proof yields a constructive version running in time .
Proof pointer
P. 7, induction on . For an -subset of the points and a volume , the points completing to volume satisfy a homogeneous polynomial equation. Lemma 4.1 (p. 6), taken from Hartshorne, splits its intersection with into at most irreducible components of dimension and degree at most ; each holds fewer than of the points, else the induction finishes. Coloring each -set by its volume, with zero-volume sets given unique colors, is then -good, and Lemma 2.1 gives the rainbow clique. Iterating gives , and , a variety of dimension and degree 1, gives the theorem.
Read depth
Claims checked: Theorem 1.2, Theorem 4.2, Lemma 4.1 as stated, the definitions and the upper-bound statements were read clause by clause on the page images of arXiv:1401.6734v3. The proofs were read for structure only, and nothing here is independently reviewed.
Dependencies
Lemma 2.1; Lemma 4.1 of the paper, which it derives from Theorem I.7.7 of Hartshorne, Algebraic Geometry (1977).
Source. D. Conlon, J. Fox, W. Gasarch, D. G. Harris, D. Ulrich and S. Zbarsky, Distinct volume subsets, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 29 (2015), 472--480, doi:10.1137/140954519; pages cited are those of the arXiv version arXiv:1401.6734v3, the edition named on the source card.
Bears on
- Problem 1208: the case is a lower bound for the problem's , weaker than Proposition 1.1; the theorem's other cases concern volumes, not distances.